Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Lomustine chemo for haemophagocytic histiocytic sarcoma
By Elliott, J·Published in Australian veterinary journal·2018·Willows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Lomustine chemotherapy for the treatment of presumptive haemophagocytic histiocytic sarcoma in Flat-coated Retrievers.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of Flat-coated Retrievers diagnosed with a serious condition called haemophagocytic histiocytic sarcoma (HPHS) were treated with a chemotherapy drug called lomustine. Despite receiving this treatment along with supportive care, the dogs did not show significant improvement in their health and had a median survival time of just 24 days after diagnosis. Most dogs experienced symptoms related to their illness, but they did not suffer major side effects from the chemotherapy itself. Unfortunately, the prognosis for this disease remains very poor, highlighting the need for more research into effective treatments.
People also search for: Flat-coated Retriever cancer treatment · haemophagocytic histiocytic sarcoma symptoms · lomustine for dogs · dog cancer prognosis · chemotherapy side effects in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Flat-coated Retriever (FCR) is a breed at-risk for histiocytic sarcoma (HS). A haemophagocytic form of HS (HPHS) occurs in the spleen ± other sites such as bone marrow, and is a CD11d+ disease of macrophage origin. Patients with HPHS typically present with regenerative anaemia. Lomustine is a well-accepted, first-line chemotherapy for dogs with HS, but its specific utility in dogs with HPHS has not been previously reported. METHODS: A cohort of 10 dogs presumptively diagnosed with HPHS via splenic ± bone marrow or liver aspiration cytology were treated with lomustine, plus supportive medications as required. Cytology of liver and bone marrow was diagnostically useful in patients where splenic cytology was less convincing. RESULTS: No dogs experienced significant constitutional or gastrointestinal adverse effects following lomustine administration, though most dogs displayed clinical signs associated with the underlying disease. No patients appeared to derive discernible clinical benefit from chemotherapy. Neutropenia was a common adverse effect of lomustine. Concurrent medications included corticosteroids in all cases, prior to the diagnosis of HPHS, for a provisional diagnosis of immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia. Median survival time of the treated dogs was 24 days from diagnosis (range, 4-67 days). CONCLUSIONS: HPHS affecting FCRs appears to have a uniformly poor outcome and is rapidly fatal. Lomustine chemotherapy was unsuccessful in significantly improving outcome in this cohort of patients. Further study of this rare and devastating disease is needed.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30478839/