PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Long-term CT scans track neck bone changes in Great Danes

By Vansteenkiste, Daniella et al.·Published in BMC veterinary research·2019·College of Veterinary Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Long-term computed tomography follow-up in great Danes with or without signs of osseous- associated cervical Spondylomyelopathy.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 12 Great Danes, six with cervical spondylomyelopathy (a neck condition that can cause pain and mobility issues) and six without any symptoms, underwent long-term CT scans to see how their condition progressed over time. After about two years, some dogs with the condition developed new areas of narrowing in their spine, and a couple of healthy dogs also showed similar changes. However, most of the dogs did not experience significant worsening of their condition. This suggests that while some dogs may develop new issues, many remain stable over time.

People also search for: Great Dane neck problems · cervical spondylomyelopathy in dogs · dog CT scan results · signs of spinal issues in Great Danes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osseous- associated cervical spondylomyelopathy (OA-CSM) has a high prevalence in Great Danes. In order to understand the progression of osseous changes, we aimed to perform a long-term computed tomographic (CT) follow-up study of Great Dane dogs with and without OA-CSM. Canine CSM is comparable to a common neurologic disease often diagnosed in older people termed cervical spondylotic myelopathy or degenerative cervical myelopathy, which is progressive in nature. The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in people has been well described, whereas there is scarce information on the natural history of canine OA-CSM. Our first goal was to evaluate if follow-up CT studies showed any changes compared to initial CT studies in Great Dane dogs with a diagnosis of OA-CSM. Our second goal was to establish whether clinically normal Great Danes went on to develop any vertebral changes or clinical signs consistent with OA-CSM. We enrolled Great Danes diagnosed with OA-CSM and clinically normal Great Danes who had previously participated in a prospective study. All dogs had clinical and CT follow-up evaluations. RESULTS: Twelve Great Dane dogs were investigated: six OA-CSM affected and six clinically normal dogs. The median time between CT studies was 28 months (OA-CSM dogs) and 25 months (normal dogs). On follow-up CT, two OA-CSM-affected dogs developed new sites of stenosis, and two clinically normal dogs developed new sites of stenosis (one each). Disc spaces most commonly affected were C4-C5, C5-C6 and C6-C7. New sites of foraminal stenosis were noted in two of the CSM-affected and four of the clinically normal dogs. Morphometric evaluation showed no statistically significant differences between the initial and follow-up CT studies in the OA-CSM affected or normal groups. CONCLUSION: Our long-term CT follow-up study documented progression of vertebral canal stenosis in four out of twelve dogs. The majority of dogs did not develop new sites of stenosis or show progression of vertebral lesions.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30866937/