Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Long-term effects of motivational interviewing on dog dental care
By Enlund, Karolina Brunius et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2024·Department of Clinical Sciences·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Long-term effects of motivational interviewing vs. traditional counseling on dog owners' adherence to veterinary dental home care: a three-year follow-up study.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dog owners was studied to see how different types of communication from veterinarians affected their adherence to daily tooth brushing for their dogs. Over three years, owners who received motivational interviewing (a supportive conversation style) brushed their dogs' teeth more often than those who received no extra guidance. While both communication methods improved dental health, the motivational interviewing group had less plaque buildup compared to the control group. This suggests that regular communication with vets can help owners take better care of their dogs' dental health, even if daily brushing is still a challenge for many.
People also search for: dog dental care tips · how to brush my dog's teeth · benefits of dog teeth brushing · motivational interviewing for dog owners · improving dog dental health
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Periodontal disease is one of the most common health issues in dogs. However, disease is largely preventable by eliminating dental plaque, best achieved by daily tooth brushing. Unfortunately, owner adherence is low to the recommendation of daily tooth brushing in dogs. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of various communication strategies, traditional advice (TA) versus motivational interviewing (MI), and compare them to a control group receiving no additional communication (CG), on dog owners' performance of dental home care and the oral health of their dogs. METHODS: The study was conducted as a longitudinal clinical intervention study spanning 3 years, and involved 75 dog owners with young dogs who were randomly assigned to one of three groups: TA, MI, or CG. Intervention groups received annual telephone consultations based on their assigned methodology. A questionnaire was administered twice to all groups, and the dental health of the dogs was assessed at the study's conclusion. RESULT: Tooth brushing frequency demonstrated a significant increase in the MI group compared to the CG group ( < 0.01), albeit with a relatively low occurrence of daily brushing among owners. Dental health assessment revealed a significantly lower plaque index in the MI group compared to the CG group ( < 0.05), and a lower calculus index in the TA group compared to the CG group ( < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were observed between the MI and TA groups in terms of dental health. CONCLUSION: Regular veterinary communication appears to have a positive influence on dog owner adherence to veterinary recommendations concerning dental care in dogs. Communication with veterinarians (MI and traditional advice) improved owner knowledge, attitude, and decreased frequency of not brushing. Although dental health parameters improved, the effect size was small, suggesting the complexity of adherence. Personalized calls to dog owners offer potential for dental health improvement, warranting further comparison of MI with traditional advice.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38596465/