Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Hydraulic urethral sphincter helps urinary leaking in female dogs
By Rose, Scott A et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2009·Affiliated Veterinary Specialists, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Long-term efficacy of a percutaneously adjustable hydraulic urethral sphincter for treatment of urinary incontinence in four dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
Four spayed female dogs suffering from urinary incontinence were treated with a special hydraulic device surgically placed to help control their bladder. After the surgery, their ability to hold urine improved significantly over the next two years, with one dog needing a minor adjustment to maintain continence. While one dog had a minor issue with the surgical site, all dogs remained dry and comfortable. This treatment shows promise for dogs that don’t respond to other medications for urinary incontinence.
People also search for: dog urinary incontinence treatment · hydraulic urethral sphincter for dogs · spayed dog leaking urine solutions
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a surgically placed, static hydraulic urethral sphincter (SHUS) for treatment of urethral sphincter mechanism incompetency (USMI). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. ANIMALS: Spayed female dogs (n=4) with acquired USMI. METHODS: Urinary incontinence was assessed using a subjective continence score before and after implantation of an SHUS on the proximal urethra via ventral median celiotomy. Dogs were assessed for urinary continence, urinary tract infections, and implant-associated complications for 30 months. Residual incontinence was treated with percutaneous inflation of the SHUS with sterile saline solution through a biocompatible subcutaneous administration port. RESULTS: At last follow-up (26-30 months after surgery), continence scores improved from a median preoperative score of 3/10 to a median postoperative score of 10. One dog developed wound drainage over the subcutaneously placed administration port but remained continent after port removal. Three occluders were percutaneously filled with additional saline (median, 0.18 mL; mean, 0.16 mL) to improve continence after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Application and adjustment of an SHUS provided sustained improvements in continence score in all dogs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In this pilot study, 3 of 4 dogs with hydraulic urethral sphincter implantation had successful percutaneous adjustment and maintained improved continence scores for 2 years after surgery. Continence was maintained in the 4th dog even after administration port removal. Based on this pilot study, the SHUS warrants further clinical evaluation for treatment of dogs with USMI unresponsive to medical management.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19674418/