PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Long-term results of high tibial osteotomy for dog knee ligament

By Treharne, Rhys et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2026·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Long-term outcome of high tibial osteotomy for canine cranial cruciate ligament disease without stifle exploration: an observational study of 236 stifles.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A 5-year-old Labrador was brought in for limping on the right back leg after surgery for a torn cranial cruciate ligament. After the surgery, some dogs experienced late lameness, but many improved without needing further surgery. In this case, 24 dogs had their limping resolved with nonsurgical treatment, while a few required additional surgery to remove damaged tissue. Overall, the long-term outcomes were similar for dogs that had surgery and those that didn't need further intervention, suggesting that not all injuries require additional surgery to heal.

People also search for: dog limping after cruciate ligament surgery · Labrador knee surgery recovery · nonsurgical treatment for dog lameness

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the long-term outcome of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease treated with high tibial osteotomy (HTO) without arthrotomy and meniscal evaluation with the use of validated owner-reported outcome measures, report postoperative clinical management of late lameness with a meniscal-sparing approach, and compare the outcome of dogs undergoing HTO without arthrotomy with that of dogs undergoing subsequent arthrotomy and meniscectomy for late lameness. METHODS: A retrospective review (March 2018 to March 2022) of preoperative clinical data and postoperative short- and long-term outcome data was conducted. Late lameness was defined as acute lameness occurring after the expected normal postoperative return to function, managed with a meniscal-sparing approach. Owner-reported outcome was compared between dogs that had undergone late meniscectomy and dogs that had not undergone stifle exploration. RESULTS: There were 191 dogs (236 stifles) undergoing HTO without concurrent stifle exploration. Late lameness was recorded in 37 stifles (15.7%) at a median of 141 days (IQR, 97 to 189 days) postoperatively. Resolution of lameness was achieved in 24 stifles with meniscal-sparing nonsurgical management. The remaining 13 stifles underwent stifle arthrotomy and meniscectomy. The overall meniscectomy rate was 13 of 236 (5.5%). There was no difference between Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs and Canine Orthopedic Index scores of dogs undergoing late meniscectomy and those not undergoing stifle exploration. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term owner-reported outcome after HTO with a meniscal-sparing approach was not different from that after HTO and meniscectomy. Some late meniscal injuries may experience clinical resolution with nonsurgical management. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Some meniscal lesions may not be clinically significant. The need for routine stifle exploration is questionable.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41604766/