PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Long-term results of two anal sac tumor surgeries in dogs

By Fontes, Gabrielle S et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2023·College of Veterinary Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Long-term outcomes associated with a modified versus traditional closed anal sacculectomy for treatment of canine anal sac neoplasia.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 90 dogs with anal sac tumors underwent surgery to remove the affected glands using either a modified or traditional method. After the procedures, some dogs experienced minor complications, but most recovered well. The rates of tumor recurrence and spread to other parts of the body were similar between the two surgical techniques. Overall, about 70% of the dogs were still alive at the end of the study, indicating that both surgical options can be effective for treating anal sac neoplasia in dogs.

People also search for: dog anal sac tumor surgery · anal sacculectomy recovery · dog anal gland cancer treatment

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the short-term and long-term outcomes of dogs that underwent the modified closed and traditional closed anal sacculectomy procedures for the treatment of anal sac neoplasia. ANIMALS: 90 client-owned dogs. METHODS: The medical records of 2 tertiary referral hospitals were reviewed to identify dogs that underwent anal sacculectomy for treatment of anal sac neoplasia between January 2016 and December 2020. Data collected included signalment and preoperative diagnostic findings. The occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, short-term outcomes, and long-term outcomes were also collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarize dog signalment information, and recurrence, metastasis, and survival proportions were compared between techniques using Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: 35 and 55 dogs, respectively, underwent the modified or traditional closed anal sacculectomy procedure. Minor postoperative complications that resolved with minimal intervention occurred in 5 of 35 (14.3%) modified approach dogs and 12 of 55 (21.8%) traditional approach dogs. Tumor recurrence was confirmed in 8 of 35 (22.9%) modified and 8 of 55 (26.4%) traditional approach dogs and was suspected in 3 of 35 (8.6%) and 6 of 55 (13.2%; P = .68), respectively. Confirmed metastatic disease was identified in 8 of 35 (22.9%) and 14 of 53 (26.4%) modified and traditional approach dogs, respectively, and was suspected in 4 of 35 (11.4%) and 7 of 53 (13.2%). Sixty-three (70%) dogs survived to study conclusion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: No benefits in complication rate or local recurrence were identified in dogs following the modified approach as opposed to the traditional closed anal sacculectomy technique.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37586695/