PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

PPARgamma drug does not stop heart changes in dogs with severe heart

By Suzuki, George et al.·Published in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy·2007·Henry Ford Heart & Vascular Institute, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Long-term pharmacological activation of PPARgamma does not prevent left ventricular remodeling in dogs with advanced heart failure.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 21 dogs with advanced heart failure were treated with a medication called GW347845 to see if it could help their heart function. Over three months, the dogs receiving the medication did not show improvement; in fact, their heart function worsened similarly to those who did not receive any treatment. The study found that the medication did not prevent the heart from changing in a negative way, and it did not help reduce inflammation or other heart-related issues. Unfortunately, the dogs continued to experience heart problems despite the treatment.

People also search for: dog heart failure treatment · advanced heart disease in dogs · GW347845 for dogs heart problems

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) activators affect the myocardium through inhibition of inflammatory cytokines and metabolic modulation but their effect in the progression of heart failure is unclear. In the present study, we examined the effects of the PPARgamma activator, GW347845 (GW), on the progression of heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Heart failure was produced in 21 dogs by intracoronary microembolizations to LV ejection fraction (EF) less than 30% and randomized to 3 months of therapy with high-dose GW (10 mg/Kg daily, n = 7), low-dose GW (3 mg/Kg daily, n = 7), or no therapy (control, n = 7). In control dogs, EF significantly decreased (28 +/- 1 vs. 22 +/- 1%, p < 0.001) and end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) increased during the 3 months of the follow-up period (64 +/- 4 vs. 76 +/- 5; p = 0.003, 46 +/- 3 vs. 59 +/- 4 ml, p = 0.002, respectively). In dogs treated with low-dose GW, EDV increased significantly (69 +/- 4 vs.81 +/- 5 ml, p = 0.01), whereas ESV remained statistically unchanged (50 +/- 3 vs. 54 +/- 3 ml, p = 0.10) resulting in modestly increased ejection fraction (27 +/- 1 vs. 32 +/- 3%, p = 0.05). In dogs treated with high-dose GW, both EDV and ESV increased (72 +/- 4 vs. 79 +/- 5 ml, p = 0.04; 53 +/- 3 vs. 62 +/- 5 ml, p = 0.04) and EF decreased (26 +/- 1 vs. 23 +/- 1%, p = 0.04) as with control dogs. There was significantly increased myocardial hypertrophy as evidenced by increased LV weight to body weight ratio and myocyte cross-section area in the GW treated animals compared to controls. Compared to control, treatment with GW had no effect on mRNA expression of PPARgamma, inflammatory cytokines, stretch response proteins, or transcription factors that may induce hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term PPARgamma activation with GW did not prevent progressive LV remodeling in dogs with advanced heart failure.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17294127/