Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Long-term results of unilateral pectineal suspension for apical
By Brucker CVM et al.·2026·Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Germany·View original on Europe PMC →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Long-term results of apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension: A clinical trial.
Plain-English summary
In a study involving 47 patients who underwent a new surgical technique called unilateral pectineal suspension (UPS) to fix a type of pelvic organ prolapse, researchers followed up after at least two years to see how well the procedure worked over time. They found that the stability of the pelvic area remained high, with only two patients needing additional surgery for a recurrence of the prolapse. However, some patients developed symptoms in other areas, although the main site remained stable. The study suggested that older age might increase the chances of needing further surgery, but this wasn't a strong finding. Overall, the results indicate that UPS is an effective long-term solution for this type of prolapse.
Abstract
<h4>Introduction</h4>Unilateral pectineal suspension (UPS) is a novel method for mesh-free apical prolapse correction. Short-term follow-up results 6 months after isolated UPS have been very encouraging, resulting in excellent apex stability and high patient satisfaction in a cohort of 47 patients with mostly advanced prolapse.<h4>Methods</h4>In order to assess the long-term outcome after isolated UPS, all 47 patients from the original patient cohort treated with isolated UPS were invited for a scheduled follow-up examination after a minimum follow-up period of two years to determine whether the result of the primary surgery remained stable. We analyzed the outcome with regard to apex stability, residual defects, and procedure-related morbidity.<h4>Results</h4>UPS as a stand-alone procedure showed high stability at the apex. Throughout the two-year follow-up period, only two patients (4.3%) required secondary surgery for apical recurrence. Increasing age correlated significantly with apical recurrence. Six patients became symptomatic in the anterior and/or the posterior compartment while the apex remained stable (13.0%). With increasing age, the probability of secondary surgery also appeared to rise, however, this was not statistically significant. There was no method-related morbidity.<h4>Conclusion</h4>UPS is a valuable concept for mesh-free apical prolapse correction. Two-year follow-up after isolated UPS shows stable results at the apex. A combined approach may be valuable to reduce the potential necessity of secondary surgery in the anterior / posterior compartment.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Europe PMC: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41729323