PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Low-dose atropine for myopia progression in children: a 2017-2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Year:
2026
Authors:
Magurno L et al.
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones en Medicina Traslacional (IIMT)

Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>Low-dose atropine (0.01%) eye drops have emerged as a proposed intervention to slow myopic progression in children, but their short-term efficacy remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized, placebo-controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of 0.01% atropine in preventing myopia progression.<h4>Methods</h4>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (through October 2024) identified double-blind randomized trials published from 2017 to 2024 that compared atropine 0.01% with placebo in children. Primary outcomes were the changes in refractive error (spherical equivalent) and axial length over at least 1 year. Secondary outcomes included treatment-related adverse events (e.g., photophobia). Data were extracted, pooled using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed (I<sup>2</sup> statistic).<h4>Results</h4>Nine trials (<i>n</i> = 1,091) met inclusion. Spherical equivalent refraction (SER): MD +0.14 D/year (95% CI +0.04 to +0.24, <i>p</i> = 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 64%). Axial length: MD -0.05 mm/year (95% CI -0.08 to -0.01, <i>p</i> = 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 30%). Photophobia: RR 1.17 (95% CI 0.43-3.20, <i>p</i> = 0.69; I<sup>2</sup> = 15%).<h4>Conclusion</h4>At 12 months, 0.01% atropine yields small but statistically significant reductions in the progression of spherical-equivalent refraction and axial elongation, with no statistically significant increase in photophobia versus placebo, although absolute photophobia rates were higher in the atropine group (9.8% vs. 5.9%). Effects are modest and heterogeneous, and the 95% prediction intervals include the null, supporting the need for larger, longer-term trials to define the durability and clinical relevance of these findings.<h4>Systematic review registration</h4>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024583729.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41676097