Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
MRI features of incomplete humeral condyle ossification in dogs
By Piola, Valentina et al.·Published in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association·2012·Department of Veterinary Medicine, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Magnetic resonance imaging features of canine incomplete humeral condyle ossification.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A 7-month-old Labrador was brought in for a check-up due to concerns about his elbow. The vet suspected incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle (IOHC), a condition where a bone in the elbow doesn't fully form, which can lead to pain and limping. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an intracondylar defect that wasn't visible on regular X-rays, highlighting the importance of MRI for early detection. The dog was monitored, and while he initially showed no signs of a fissure, he developed one several months later. Early diagnosis through MRI can help manage this condition before it worsens.
People also search for: dog elbow pain MRI · Labrador incomplete ossification · dog humeral condyle treatment
Abstract
Incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle (IOHC) is characterized by an intracondylar fissure located where the intercondylar physis is present in growing dogs. Its radiologic and computed tomographic features have been described but the magnetic resonance (MR) features have not been characterized. Our purpose was to further describe the range of MRappearances of IOHC, to assess the diagnostic capability of MRrelative to radiology, and to determine whether MRis able to identify the disease before a fissure forms. Thirty-eight elbow MRscans and radiographs, when available, were reviewed and divided into three groups. In Group 1 (affected elbows, n = 22), there was an intracondylar defect on MRwith variable appearance; the defect was not visible radiographically in 32% of the elbows. The main difference between Group 2 (nonaffected elbows, n = 6) and Group 3 (contralaterals to IOHC or to condylar fracture, without fissure, n = 10) was the appearance of the humeral condyle in short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences: all elbows in Group 2 had a homogeneous humeral condyle, whereas all but one in Group 3 were heterogeneous. One dog in Group 3 developed a complete condylar fissure 7 months after the first examination, when no evidence of an intracondylar defect had been detected. The MRappearance of IOHC is variable and a heterogeneous humeral condyle in STIR images without a clear defect may warn of the possibility for the subsequent development of a condylar fissure.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22548383/