Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Managing chronic pleural effusion in dogs and cats with PleuralPort
By Tirillini, F et al.·Published in New Zealand veterinary journal·2025·Small Animal Department·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Management of chronic pleural effusion in dogs and cats using the PleuralPort device: complications and outcome of 30 cases (2005-2024).
Plain-English summary
A group of 30 pets, including 26 dogs and 4 cats, were treated for chronic pleural effusion (fluid buildup in the chest) using a device called the PleuralPort. Most of the fluid was linked to conditions like chylothorax (lymphatic fluid), cancer, or inflammation. While some pets experienced complications such as infections or tube blockages, the majority of issues were manageable, and most pets tolerated the device well. Overall, pet owners reported high satisfaction with the treatment, indicating it was a good alternative to traditional drainage methods.
People also search for: dog pleural effusion treatment · cat pleural effusion symptoms · PleuralPort complications in pets
Abstract
CASE HISTORY: Medical records of cases with pleural effusion managed with the PleuralPort device (PPD) were reviewed retrospectively at two veterinary hospitals in Italy. Cases with PPD placement at initial or second surgery and with a minimum follow-up of 4 weeks were included. Data retrieved from the records included signalment, fluid analysis, duration of implantation, duration of function, and complications. The PPD was placed subcutaneously in the dorsal thorax and connected to a drainage tube inserted in the pleural space. Complications were divided into intra-operative, short-term (≤ 12 weeks) and long-term (> 12 weeks). Owners were contacted by telephone for follow-up information, using a non-standardised questionnaire. CLINICAL FINDINGS: A total of 30 animals were included in the study: 26 dogs and four cats. Pleural fluid was compatible with chylothorax (22/30), neoplastic pleural effusion (5/30) and inflammatory pleural effusion (3/30).No intra-operative complications were reported. Overall, post-operative complications occurred in 9/30 (30%) patients. Major complications developed in six (20%) cases, including infection, tube kinking, pneumothorax and obstruction. Minor complications in four cases (13.3%) included skin inflammation, discomfort and dislocation of the device. Short-term complications developed in 7/30 (23.3%) cases and long-term complications in 3/22 (13.6%) cases that survived longer than 12 weeks after surgery. Owner satisfaction was very good in 28/30 (93.3%) cases. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The PPD was well tolerated by the animals and was a feasible alternative to thoracostomy tubes for the management of chronic pleural effusion in dogs and cats. Although complications were relatively common, they were easily treated in most patients.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39956534/