PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Maropitant stops vomiting but not reflux in anesthetized dogs

By Johnson, Rebecca A·Published in Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia·2014·Department of Surgical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Maropitant prevented vomiting but not gastroesophageal reflux in anesthetized dogs premedicated with acepromazine-hydromorphone.

Species:
dog
Dog vomitingStomach & digestionDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 26 dogs undergoing surgery were given either maropitant, a medication to prevent vomiting, or a saline solution before anesthesia. The dogs that received maropitant did not experience any vomiting or retching, while nearly half of the dogs given saline did. However, maropitant did not stop gastroesophageal reflux (GER), a condition where stomach acid flows back into the esophagus, as some dogs in both groups still had GER. Overall, maropitant was effective in preventing vomiting but not GER, suggesting it may be helpful for dogs undergoing anesthesia.

People also search for: dog vomiting after anesthesia · maropitant for dogs · gastroesophageal reflux in dogs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of maropitant for prevention of vomiting and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in dogs following acepromazine-hydromorphone premedication and inhalation anesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, blinded, prospective clinical study. ANIMALS: Twenty-six dogs admitted for elective soft tissue or orthopedic procedures that were 3.1 ±3.1 years of age and weighed 20.5 ± 11.4 kg. METHODS: Dogs were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group M received maropitant (1.0 mg kg(-1) ) and Group S received 0.9% saline (0.1 mL kg(-1) ) intravenously 45-60 minutes before premedication with hydromorphone (0.1 mg kg(-1) ) and acepromazine (0.03 mg kg(-1) ) intramuscularly. An observer blinded to treatment documented any retching or vomiting for 20 minutes before induction with propofol (2-6 mg kg(-1) ) and inhalation anesthesia. A pH probe inserted into the distal esophagus was used to detect GER. RESULTS: None of the dogs in Group M retched or vomited (0/13), 6/13 (46%) in Group S were observed to retch or vomit, and the difference between groups was significant (p = 0.015). There were no differences between groups in the number of dogs with GER (Group M: 4/13, Group S: 6/13 dogs) or the number of reflux events. Esophageal pH at the end of anesthesia was significantly lower in both M and S groups in dogs with GER versus dogs without GER (p = 0.004 and 0.011, respectively). Only dogs with GER in Group S had significantly lower pH at the end compared to the beginning of anesthesia (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Intravenous maropitant prevented retching and vomiting associated with acepromazine-hydromorphone premedication. Maropitant did not prevent the occurrence of GER. Fewer dogs in Group M developed GER but further study with a larger number of dogs is necessary to determine if there is a significant difference.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24330310/