Measurement of extraction forces of non-absorbable suture and different anchoring systems used for pelvic organ prolapse surgery using soft-embalmed cadavers: A feasibility study.

Abstract

<h4>Objective</h4>Success of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) mesh procedures also depends on reliable anchoring systems (AS). Our primary aim was to assess the use of soft-embalmed cadavers in testing of different AS and our secondary aim was to compare extraction forces (EF) of different AS and non-absorbable suture (NAS).<h4>Study design</h4>IRB approval was obtained. NAS (Ti-cron®) and different AS were attached to force-measuring instrument (Dynamometer SS25LA) and anchored to anterior longitudinal (ALL) and pectineal ligament (PL) (Protack®, Uplift®, NAS), and sacrospinous ligament (SSL) (Surelift®, Elevate PC®, NAS) of Thiel soft-embalmed cadavers. EF were measured 2-4 times in each cadaver. Data were compared using non-parametric tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.<h4>Results</h4>Three female cadavers (age 59, 77 and 87) were used. NAS EF were significantly higher than AS EF for ALL and SSL, but not PL. Thiel soft-embalmed cadavers proved to be useful in testing of different AS.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Use of soft-embalmed cadavers in testing of different AS is feasible. According to our results, the NAS provides most reliable intra-corporeal fixation. However, significant inter- and intra-subject variability indicates that results may also be dependent on the tissue properties and anchoring procedure. Further testing using soft-embalmed cadavers could help optimise mesh procedures and establish a threshold EF necessary for reliable fixation.