PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Lameness and cartilage damage in dogs after meniscal release surgery

By Luther, Jill K et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2009·University of Missouri, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Meniscal release in cruciate ligament intact stifles causes lameness and medial compartment cartilage pathology in dogs 12 weeks postoperatively.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of hound dogs underwent a surgical procedure called meniscal release (MR) to see how it affected their knee joints. After 12 weeks, the dogs that had the MR surgery were limping more and showed signs of joint damage compared to those that had a sham (fake) surgery. The MR dogs had worse cartilage damage and more severe issues with their knee meniscus. This suggests that MR surgery can lead to long-term problems like arthritis and lameness in dogs.

People also search for: dog limping after knee surgery · meniscal release surgery effects in dogs · dog arthritis treatment after surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate after 12 weeks the effects of caudal medial meniscal release (MR) in the cranial cruciate ligament-intact canine stifle. STUDY DESIGN: Blinded, prospective in vivo study. ANIMALS: Purpose-bred hound dogs (n=10). METHODS: Either MR (n=5) or a sham (SH) surgery (n=5) was performed via arthroscopy. Orthopedic examination and subjective lameness evaluation were performed in each dog preoperatively and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery. Twelve weeks postoperatively, ultrasonographic, radiographic, and arthroscopic examinations were performed on the operated stifles. Gross pathology of the articular cartilage, cruciate ligaments, and menisci was assessed. India ink staining of the femoral and tibial articular surfaces was performed to determine the percent area of articular cartilage damage. RESULTS: At 8 and 12 weeks after surgery, MR dogs were lamer than SH dogs. At 12 weeks, the degree of radiographic OA was significantly higher in MR stifles than in SH stifles. Gross and sonographic meniscal pathology was more severe in MR stifles compared with SH stifles. MR stifles had significantly more severe articular cartilage pathology compared with SH stifles 12 weeks after surgery; pathology was most severe in the medial compartment. CONCLUSIONS: MR alone is associated with articular cartilage loss, further meniscal pathology, degenerative joint disease, and lameness. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Subsequent osteoarthritis and dysfunction of the stifle joint should be considered when making clinical decisions regarding MR in dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19538675/