Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Mesh placement and risks of hernia return and ileus after repair
By Á Lakjuni E et al.·2026·Department of Surgery·View original on Europe PMC →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Mesh placement and the risk of recurrence and ileus in primary ventral hernia repair: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Plain-English summary
This study looked at how different placements of mesh during surgery for ventral hernias (a type of bulge in the abdominal wall) affect the chances of the hernia coming back and the risk of ileus (a condition where the intestines don't work properly). Researchers reviewed 21 studies involving over 11,000 adults who had this surgery and found that there were no significant differences in the recurrence rates of hernias, regardless of where the mesh was placed. They also noted that only one study mentioned ileus, with very few cases reported. Overall, the evidence was considered low quality, and the researchers concluded that more studies are needed to better understand these issues, especially since many of the studies had short follow-up times.
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>Primary ventral hernia repair is a common surgical procedure. Although mesh use reduces the risk of recurrence, the optimal anatomic location remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate recurrence rates based on mesh placement, with ileus as a secondary outcome.<h4>Methods</h4>This review included studies comparing mesh placements in adults undergoing elective primary ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh, hernia defects ≤10 cm, and at least 6 months of follow-up. PubMed, Embase Ovid, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on February 17, 2025. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD 420251013190). The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's RoB-2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were synthesized using network meta-analysis.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 21 studies involving 11,037 adult patients were included. Thirteen studies were eligible for the network meta-analysis, which demonstrated no significant differences in recurrence rates among preperitoneal, retromuscular, intraperitoneal onlay mesh, and onlay mesh placements. The certainty of the evidence was rated as low. Only 1 study reported ileus, with 3 cases among 318 patients.<h4>Conclusion</h4>No differences in recurrence rates were observed among the anatomic layers of mesh placements. The results suggest that the increasing use of retromuscular and preperitoneal mesh placements is not supported by strong comparative evidence. There was insufficient evidence to assess any association between ileus and the different mesh placements. However, most of the included studies had relatively short follow-up periods, which may limit the assessment of long-term outcomes and highlight the need for further research.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Europe PMC: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41240484