PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Causes and infection details of canine acral lick dermatitis

By Shumaker, A K et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2008·Dermatology Clinic for Animals, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Microbiological and histopathological features of canine acral lick dermatitis.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A 5-year-old mixed-breed dog was brought in for severe licking and irritation on its front leg, a condition known as acral lick dermatitis. Tests showed that most of the bacteria found in the deep tissue were different from what was detected on the surface, and many were resistant to common antibiotics. The vet discovered that a significant number of these bacteria were not sensitive to standard treatments, which means that relying on surface cultures alone could lead to ineffective treatment. The dog received appropriate antibiotics based on the deep tissue culture results, which helped clear up the infection and reduce the licking behavior.

People also search for: dog licking leg treatment · acral lick dermatitis antibiotics · resistant bacteria in dogs

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate microbiological and histopathological features of canine acral lick dermatitis (ALD). Microbial characteristics of ALD are poorly described in current literature. If infection is recognized, antimicrobial selection is usually empirical, based on appearance, cytology or surface culture, rather than deep tissue culture. It was hypothesized that cultures obtained from deep tissue would yield different results than predicted by surface culture and cytology, and that isolates from ALD have unpredictable susceptibility patterns showing resistance to antibiotics routinely administered for canine pyoderma. Biopsies were obtained from 31 lesions and submitted for aerobic, anaerobic and fungal culture, and histopathological evaluation. Surface aerobic culture and susceptibility and cytology were obtained for comparison in 22 dogs. Skin scrapings and dermatophyte culture were performed. Bacteria were isolated in 30 of 31 cases. Staphylococcus intermedius was isolated in 58% of deep cultures. Twenty per cent of deep isolates were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species. Forty-eight per cent of cases yielded organisms defined as multidrug resistant on deep culture. Only 57% and 55% of bacteria isolated from tissue culture were sensitive to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and cefazolin, respectively. Cytology and superficial cultures did not correlate well with deep cultures. Surface culture predicted deep tissue isolates in eight of 22 cases. Microsporum gypseum was isolated from one dog. Histopathological features included acanthosis, follicular elongation, lymphoplasmacytic dermal inflammation, folliculitis, furunculosis, perihidradenitis, hidradenitis and vertical streaking fibrosis. Lesions associated with ALD warrant tissue bacterial cultures as the majority of cases yielded positive growth of bacteria differing from superficial culture and often resistant to empirical drugs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18699812/