Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Bacteria found in trypan blue used in dog cataract surgery
By Sieve, Aaron C et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2026·Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Microbiota Analysis and Standard Culture Identify Bacteria in Ophthalmic Trypan Blue Solution Commonly Used During Canine Cataract Surgery.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study looked at different brands of a blue dye used during cataract surgery in dogs to see if they contained harmful bacteria. Samples from three brands showed that bacteria like Staphylococcus and Bacillus were present in some lots. The researchers found differences in the types of bacteria between the brands, which could help understand why some dogs develop complications after surgery. While they couldn't measure harmful substances at levels that would affect dogs, the findings suggest that the choice of dye might influence post-surgery outcomes. Pet owners should discuss these findings with their veterinarian if their dog is scheduled for cataract surgery.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify bacterial communities and quantify endotoxin within different lot numbers and brands of commercially available sterile ophthalmic trypan blue solution commonly used during canine cataract surgery; with the ultimate goal of improving our understanding of possible factors associated with post-operative fibrin web (FW) formation. PROCEDURES: Five samples from two production lots of three different brands of trypan blue (30 samples total) and reagent controls were collected for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction, 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) sequencing, sequence analysis, and classification. All samples underwent conventional aerobic and capnophilic bacterial culture. Assays for endotoxin quantification included fluorogenic, kinetic chromogenic, and turbidimetric methods. Statistical analysis assessed DNA concentration, microbial richness, and alpha (α) and beta (β) diversity. RESULTS: an-blue (4/10), VisionBlue (3/10), and MONOBLUE Saf-R (3/10) all cultured at least one organism in each lot number from the enrichment broth. Genera cultured included Staphylococcus spp., Lysinibacillus spp., Bacillus spp., and Micrococcus spp. Analysis of sequencing data revealed no significant difference in α-diversity but significant differences in weighted and unweighted measures of β-diversity (Bray-Curtis and Jaccard distances) between an-blue and VisionBlue samples. Differential abundance testing found Halomonas and Saccharofermentans to be genus-level biomarkers. Dominant families recovered from sequencing included Bifidobacteriaceae, Christensenellaceae, Clostridiaceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Lactobacillaceae, Oscillospiraceae, Propionibacteriaceae, WCHB1-41, and Streptococcaceae. Endotoxin quantification could not be performed at clinically relevant dilutions. CONCLUSIONS: Significant brand-specific differences in relative abundance of shared bacterial taxa were noted between an-blue and VisionBlue. Halomonas and Saccharofermentans were identified as genus-level biomarkers.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40846812/