PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Minimally invasive inguinal tube cystostomy in dogs and cats

By Bray, Jonathan P et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2009·Davies Veterinary Specialists, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Minimally invasive inguinal approach for tube cystostomy.

Species:
dog
Drinking & peeingDogs

Plain-English summary

A 5-year-old male cat was brought in for emergency treatment of a urinary blockage. The veterinarian performed a minimally invasive surgery to place a cystostomy tube, which helps drain urine from the bladder. This method involved a small incision in the groin area, allowing for quick and safe placement of the tube. After the procedure, the cat experienced some minor irritation, but overall, there were no major complications. The urinary blockage was resolved, and the cat recovered well with the help of antibiotics for a mild infection that developed after the tube was removed.

People also search for: cat urinary blockage treatment · cystostomy tube placement in cats · urinary tract infection in cats · emergency cat surgery · cat bladder surgery recovery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report a technique for tube cystostomy placement via a minimally invasive inguinal approach and outcome in 9 dogs and 6 cats with urinary tract obstruction or detrusor atony. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. ANIMALS: Dogs (n=9) and cats (6). METHODS: Medical records (January 2004-January 2008) of dogs and cats that had tube cystostomy via an inguinal approach were reviewed. Retrieved data included signalment, diagnosis, surgical technique, and complications. Access to the bladder was through a muscle splitting approach in the inguinal region with the cystostomy tube placed through a skin incision made several centimeters proximal to this incision and secured in the bladder by a purse string suture. Cystopexy during closure of the muscle layers ensured secure closure and minimized the likelihood of uroabdomen if tube dislodgment occurred. RESULTS: Cystostomy tubes were placed in 5 cats as an emergency procedure for treatment of acute urinary tract obstruction or urethral rupture, and as an elective procedure in 9 dogs and 1 cat. No complications occurred during cystostomy tube placement. Postprocedural complications were minor (peristomal irritation in 2 dogs with latex catheters, catheter laceration, premature removal) and only occurred when tubes were retained for >4 weeks. Urinary tract infection at catheter removal in 6 dogs resolved with antibiotic administration. CONCLUSIONS: An inguinal approach for cystostomy tube placement facilitated rapid catheter placement into the bladder with minimal soft tissue dissection. Cystopexy during abdominal wall closure provided peritoneal protection should premature dislodgement of the cystostomy tube occur. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An inguinal approach should be considered for rapid tube cystostomy particularly in metabolically compromised animals.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19573107/