Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Outcomes and complications of minimally invasive ankle fusion in 15
By Longo, Federico et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2025·Clinic for Small Animal Surgery·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis in 15 dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 15 dogs underwent a minimally invasive surgery called tarsal arthrodesis to help with issues in their back legs. After the procedure, most dogs showed good healing, with 12 out of 15 regaining proper leg alignment and many able to bear weight normally within a few months. While some dogs experienced minor complications related to the implants, there were no serious issues. Overall, this surgical method led to faster recovery times and fewer problems compared to traditional surgery. Most dogs ended up with good or acceptable limb function after the surgery.
People also search for: dog leg surgery recovery · minimally invasive surgery for dogs · tarsal arthrodesis in dogs · dog back leg alignment issues · complications after dog surgery
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to report the outcomes and complications of minimally invasive tarsal arthrodesis (MITA) in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Bi-institutional retrospective study. SAMPLE POPULATION: A total of 15 client-owned dogs. METHODS: Medical records of dogs undergoing MITA were reviewed to determine outcome and complications. Radiographs were recommended every 4 weeks until clinical union and reviewed to evaluate tibiotarsometatarsal alignment, implant position, subsequent osseous union of the debrided articulations. Time to clinical union and complications were recorded. Clinical union was defined as functional weightbearing limb use with at least 50% of osseous union. Final limb function was defined as full, acceptable, or unacceptable. RESULTS: Partial tarsal arthrodesis was performed in 10 cases and pantarsal arthrodesis in five cases. Postoperative swelling was minimal. Most complications, 26% major and 40% minor, were implant-related, and explant was required in three dogs. No catastrophic complications occurred. Mean (±sd) radiographic follow-up was 11.4 (±13.1) months Mean (±sd) time to radiographic osseous union was 1.8 (±0.5) months. Mean (±sd) time to clinical union was 3.7 (±0.8) months. Physiological alignment was restored in 12/15 dogs. Complete radiographic union occurred in 46% while in the remaining 54% obtained partial radiographic union, but clinical instability was not observed. Limb function was considered full in six and acceptable in eight dogs. Function was unacceptable in one dog, but the cause was not related to MITA. CONCLUSION: MITA resulted in restoration of alignment, which was accomplished using MITA techniques. Furthermore, MITA appeared to result in faster healing times and reduced soft tissue complications compared to conventional open approach arthrodesis. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: MITA may be considered as an option to obtain functional arthrodesis in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39235101/