PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Rifampicin effectiveness against dog Staphylococcus pseudintermedius

By Ho, Karen K et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2018·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Minimum inhibitory concentration and killing properties of rifampicin against canine Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from dogs in the southeast USA.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study looked at how well rifampicin, an antibiotic, works against a type of bacteria called Staphylococcus pseudintermedius that can cause skin infections in dogs. Researchers tested 100 samples from dogs, including both resistant and non-resistant strains. They found that rifampicin was effective against both types of bacteria, showing that it can be a good treatment option for skin infections. The results suggest that how often the medication is given is important for it to work effectively.

People also search for: dog skin infection treatment · rifampicin for dogs · Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meticillin-resistant (MR) staphylococcal pyoderma in dogs has led to increased use of alternate antibiotics such as rifampicin (RFP). However, little information exists regarding its pharmacodynamics in MR Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and killing properties of RFP for canine Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates. METHODS: The MIC of RFP was determined using the ETESTfor 50 meticillin-susceptible (MS) and 50 MR S. pseudintermedius isolates collected from dogs. From these isolates, two MS isolates (RFP MIC of 0.003 and 0.008 μg/mL, respectively) and two MR isolates (RFP MIC of 0.003 and 0.012 μg/mL, respectively) were subjected to time-kill studies. Mueller-Hinton broth was supplemented with RFP at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 times the MIC for 0, 2, 4, 10, 16 and 24 h. The number of viable colony forming units in each sample was determined using a commercial luciferase assay kit. RESULTS: The MICand MICwere the same for MS and MR isolates, at 0.004 μg/mL and 0.008 μg/mL, respectively. Rifampicin kill curves were not indicative of concentration-dependency, suggesting time-dependent activity. Two isolates (MS 0.003 and 0.008 μg/mL) exhibited bacteriostatic activity, whereas two others (MR 0.003 and 0.012 μg/mL) exhibited bactericidal activity. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: This study demonstrated that MS and MR S. pseudintermedius isolates were equally susceptible to rifampicin and that dosing intervals should be designed for time-dependent efficacy. These data can support pharmacokinetic studies of RFP in dogs with susceptible infections caused by S. pseudintermedius.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29845664/