Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Closed anal sac surgery for non-cancer anal sac disease in 50 dogs
By Davis, Allyson T & Hosgood, Giselle L·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2025·School of Veterinary Medicine, Australia·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Modified closed sacculectomy in 50 dogs with non-neoplastic anal sac disease.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 50 dogs with non-cancerous anal sac issues underwent a special surgery called modified closed sacculectomy to remove their anal sacs. During the surgery, a few dogs experienced minor complications, like perforation of the anal sac, but most of these issues resolved on their own within two weeks. After the procedure, 93% of dogs with minor complications were doing better, and even the more serious complications were resolved after additional surgery. This technique offers a safer way to treat anal sac problems in dogs, with most pets recovering well shortly after surgery.
People also search for: dog anal sac surgery recovery · non-cancerous anal sac disease in dogs · anal sac perforation treatment in dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe a modified closed sacculectomy technique for non-neoplastic anal sac disease in dogs, and to describe the management and short-term outcomes in dogs undergoing sacculectomy by the described technique. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SAMPLE POPULATION: A total of 50 dogs. METHODS: Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify dogs undergoing bilateral anal sacculectomy for non-neoplastic anal sac disease using the described closed technique between January 1, 2013 and February 1, 2024. RESULTS: A total of 50 dogs underwent bilateral anal sacculectomy for non-neoplastic anal sac disease. Intraoperative anal sac perforation was reported in five dogs (10%). A total of 43 dogs were available for two-week follow-up. Grade 1 complications were reported in 14/43 dogs (32%), grade 2 complications in 2/43 dogs (5%), and grade 3B in 2/43 dogs (5%). At two-weeks postoperatively, 13/14 dogs (93%) had resolution of grade 1 complications. Both dogs with grade 2 complications had resolution reported at two weeks postoperatively, and both dogs with grade 3B complications had resolution reported at two weeks following revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative complications consisted of anal sac perforation without further complication. Minor postoperative complications were mostly self-limiting, supporting previous literature. Major complications were infrequent and resolved following single revision surgery. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The technique reported provides an alternative to excise intact and non-neoplastic anal sacs in dogs. The key features of this technique are immediate anal sac identification by following the anatomic path of the duct, minimal peri-saccular dissection, no requirement for packing of the anal sac, and complete removal of the duct and anal sac.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39304327/