PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Safety of fast venom allergy shots for dogs with insect sting

By Moore, Alexandra et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2023·Animal Dermatology Clinic Perth, Australia·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Modified rush venom immunotherapy in dogs with Hymenoptera hypersensitivity.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 20 dogs with severe allergic reactions to insect stings, specifically honey bee and paper wasp venom, underwent a modified rush venom immunotherapy (VIT) to help prevent future reactions. Most dogs tolerated the treatment well, with 19 completing the program. While one dog had a serious reaction and had to stop, half of the dogs showed no adverse effects, and some experienced mild symptoms like nausea and itching at the injection site. Overall, the treatment appears promising for dogs with Hymenoptera hypersensitivity, but more research is needed to confirm its effectiveness.

People also search for: dog insect sting allergy treatment · Hymenoptera hypersensitivity in dogs · venom immunotherapy for dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hymenoptera envenomation occurs frequently in people and dogs and can trigger anaphylaxis. Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the only preventive treatment for Hymenoptera hypersensitivity and is indicated for people with severe adverse reactions to insect stings. Rush VIT is an accelerated VIT protocol in people. This has not been reported in dogs. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety of modified rush VIT. ANIMALS: Twenty client-owned dogs with Hymenoptera hypersensitivity based on a history of adverse reactions to Hymenoptera envenomation and a positive intradermal test to honey bee and/or paper wasp venom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dogs received incremental doses of venom via subcutaneous injection one day per week for three consecutive weeks until the maintenance dose was achieved. Vital signs were recorded every 30 min prior to venom administration. Adverse reactions were categorised as localised or grade I-IV systemic reactions. RESULTS: Nineteen of 20 dogs (95%) completed rush VIT. One dog experienced a grade III systemic adverse reaction and was withdrawn from the study. No adverse reactions occurred in 10 of 20 dogs (50%). Localised and grade I-II systemic reactions occurred in nine of 20 dogs (45%), including nausea (n = 5), injection site pruritus (n = 3) and diarrhoea and lethargy (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Modified rush VIT in dogs was well-tolerated and should be considered for dogs with Hymenoptera hypersensitivity. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of VIT in dogs for preventing hypersensitivity reactions to insect stings.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37395162/