Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Equine fever diagnostic panel results from 2019 to 2023
By Pinn-Woodcock, Toby L et al.·Published in Equine veterinary journal·2026·College of Veterinary Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Molecular detection of pathogens in an equine fever diagnostic panel: 2019-2023.
- Species:
- horse
Plain-English summary
A horse with a fever was tested using a new diagnostic panel that checks for various pathogens. Out of nearly 1,000 tests conducted from 2019 to 2023, about 38% of the horses had one or more pathogens detected, with Anaplasma phagocytophilum and beta coronavirus being the most common. Some horses had multiple infections at the same time. Based on these findings, the testing panel will soon include additional tests for Potomac Horse Fever and Salmonella to improve diagnosis.
People also search for: horse fever symptoms · equine fever diagnostic tests · Anaplasma in horses · Potomac Horse Fever treatment
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A common diagnostic approach for febrile horses is to test for a panel of potential pathogens. Panels are curated by expert opinion and vary between diagnostic laboratories. OBJECTIVES: To report the results of a newly developed equine fever diagnostic panel (EFDP) between 2019 and 2023 and evaluate the frequency of positive results. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study. METHODS: The EFDP requires submission of whole blood, nasal swab, and faecal samples, and includes PCR tests for 12 pathogens that can present as fever without localising signs of illness or infection. Submission metadata and results of all submissions with EFDP performed between July 2019 and April 2023 were tabulated. Submissions were excluded if horses were <1 year old or any tests were cancelled. RESULTS: One or more pathogens were identified on the EFDP in 366/961 (38%) cases. The most common pathogens identified were Anaplasma phagocytophilum and beta coronavirus. Co-infections with 2 or 3 pathogens were identified in 48/366 (13%) positive panels. Ancillary testing detected Salmonella in 5/23 (22%) submissions. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Clinical information regarding the cases was lacking. The majority of submissions originated from the northeastern United States, and results might not be generalisable to other geographic regions. CONCLUSIONS: The panel was able to detect a possible causative agent in approximately a third of cases. Based on the results of ancillary testing and recent literature, Potomac Horse Fever PCR on faeces (in addition to whole blood) and Salmonella culture have been added to the EFDP as of November 2024.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40384355/