PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Detecting Babesia canis infection in dog red blood cells

By Bicalho, Kelly Alves et al.·Published in Veterinary parasitology·2004·Laborat&#xf3, Brazil·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Molecular fluorescent approach to assessing intraerythrocytic hemoprotozoan Babesia canis infection in dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study found that about 22.8% of dogs tested positive for a blood infection called Babesia canis, which can cause serious health issues. This infection can be hard to detect using traditional methods, but a new flow cytometry technique showed better results. The researchers suggest that using a simple blood test to check for anemia (low red blood cell count) can help identify dogs that might have this infection, followed by the new flow cytometry method for confirmation. This approach could improve diagnosis in areas where Babesia is common, helping affected dogs get the treatment they need.

People also search for: dog Babesia canis infection symptoms · how to test for Babesia in dogs · dog anemia treatment

Abstract

The development of recent flow cytometry-based protocols for the diagnosis of canine babesiosis, Babesia gibsoni in particular, has encouraged us to investigate its applicability to detect B. canis-infected erythrocytes as well as optimize the hydroethidine-flow cytometry methodology (HE-FC), using peripheral blood samples from naturally and experimentally infected dogs. Our data demonstrated that HE at 25 microg/ml provided the most outstanding fluorescence profile, able to discriminate between infected and uninfected dogs with no alterations in cell properties such as forward scatter and unspecific fluorescence. The results were expressed as the percentage of positive fluorescent erythrocytes (PPFE) for each individual sample, with 1.53% of PPFE as the cut-off determined between infected and uninfected animals. B. canis-infected erythrocytes during both acute and chronic experimental infection were identified through HE-FC, validating its use for diagnosis purposes in endemic areas for canine babesiosis. In a clinical trial, 22.8% out of 162 dogs showed to be positive to Babesia infection through this approach. Such prevalence was similar to that estimated for altered hematological profiles (HT) < or = 30% (29%), but highly distinct from the prevalence provided by direct blood smear (BS) examination (1.8%) or immunofluorescent assay (IFA) (60.5%). Furthermore, our findings indicate that positive PPFE data was associated with HT < or = 30%, emphasizing that, in clinical practice, the haematocrit should be used as a screening test followed by HE-FC, suitable to confirm hypotheses of canine babesiosis.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15482880/