Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Multi-dose propofol tested for dog anesthesia safety and use
By Mama, Khursheed R et al.·Published in BMC veterinary research·2013·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Multicenter clinical evaluation of a multi-dose formulation of propofol in the dog.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 138 healthy dogs underwent anesthesia using a new multi-dose formulation of propofol, which is an injectable anesthetic. The dogs were monitored for heart rate, breathing, and blood pressure during the procedure. Some dogs experienced side effects like slowed breathing (apnea), low heart rate (bradycardia), and low blood pressure (hypotension), but these were generally manageable. Overall, the new anesthetic was found to be safe and effective for inducing and maintaining anesthesia in dogs. However, there was one reported death two days later due to a surgical complication, not the anesthetic itself.
People also search for: dog anesthesia side effects · propofol for dogs · dog breathing problems after surgery
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Propofol is a widely used injectable anesthetic agent for induction and short-term maintenance in dogs. A multi-dose formulation of propofol (MDP) has been developed which includes 2% benzyl alcohol as a preservative. In order to document the use of the product under clinical conditions, MDP was tested in a prospective clinical trial conducted at six sites within the United States. One hundred thirty-eight healthy, client-owned dogs were assigned to one of six treatment groups based on premedicants (none, acepromazine/buprenorphine, midazolam/buprenorphine, medetomidine/buprenorphine) and maintenance agents (MDP, inhaled anesthetic). Anesthesia was induced by the intravenous administration of MDP given to effect. Physiological indices including heart rate, respiratory rate and blood pressure were monitored prior to and during anesthesia induction, maintenance and recovery. Adverse events, defined for severity by pre-established limits of these physiological values, as well as side effects, defined as any observation outside the normal range, were noted. RESULTS: The mean intubation dose was 7.6 ± 2.1 mg/kg for MDP alone and 4.7 ± 1.3, 4.0 ± 1.0 mg/kg and 3.2 ± 1.4 mg/kg when buprenorphine was used in combination with midazolam, acepromazine and medetomidine, respectively. Of the 32 adverse events, apnea (12 incidents), bradycardia (9 incidents) and hypotension (7 incidents) were most frequently recorded. Emesis, cyanosis and second degree heart block were each noted once and successfully resolved. The cause of a single death 2 days post-anesthesia was assessed as a surgical complication. CONCLUSIONS: MDP was found to be acceptable for use in healthy dogs for induction and short term maintenance of anesthesia when used alone and in combination with premedicants and inhaled anesthetics.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24359719/