Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Signs, treatment, and recovery in dogs with spinal epidural empyema
By Laws, Emma J et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2022·Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Multicenter Study of Clinical Presentation, Treatment, and Outcome in 41 Dogs With Spinal Epidural Empyema.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 41 dogs with spinal epidural empyema (SEE), a serious infection in the spine, were treated either with surgery or conservative management. Some dogs were unable to walk when they were first seen, while others were still ambulatory. After treatment, about 79% of the dogs that were treated conservatively and 75% of those that had surgery were able to return to a normal life. The study suggests that dogs who can still walk might do well with conservative treatment, while those needing surgery generally have good outcomes, although older dogs may not recover as well.
People also search for: dog spinal infection treatment · spinal surgery for dogs · dog unable to walk recovery · conservative treatment for dog spine problems
Abstract
There is limited information on canine spinal epidural empyema (SEE). The aim of this multicenter retrospective study is to describe the clinical presentation and outcome of dogs undergoing spinal surgery or conservative management for SEE. Forty-one dogs met the inclusion criteria; the SEE was treated surgically in 17 dogs and conservatively in 24 dogs. Two dogs underwent spinal surgery after failure of conservative management, meaning that 19 dogs in total had spinal surgery. Long-term (i.e., >6 months) follow-up was available in 35 dogs (19 conservatively treated and 16 surgically treated dogs). Recovery to a functional pet status was achieved in 15/19 (78.9%) conservatively treated and 12/16 (75%) surgically treated dogs. There was no significant difference (= 1.000) in long-term outcome between conservatively and surgically treated dogs (78.9 and 75%, respectively). However, significantly more surgically treated dogs were non-ambulatory at presentation (9/17 vs. 5/24,= 0.048) compared with conservatively treated dogs. This study suggests that conservative treatment may be appropriate for dogs with SEE that are ambulatory at presentation and that surgically treated dogs generally have good outcomes. Age may be a negative prognostic indicator as dogs with poor long-term outcomes were significantly older than dogs with a good long-term outcome (= 0.048). A larger prospective randomized study may provide further insight on treatment and outcome of SEE in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35330611/