PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Salmonella found in 2.5% of US dogs and cats tested 2012-2014

By Reimschuessel, Renate et al.·Published in Journal of clinical microbiology·2017·U.S. Food and Drug Administration, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Multilaboratory Survey To Evaluate Salmonella Prevalence in Diarrheic and Nondiarrheic Dogs and Cats in the United States between 2012 and 2014.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A survey of nearly 3,000 dogs and cats in the U.S. found that about 2.5% of dogs tested positive for Salmonella, a bacteria that can cause diarrhea and other health issues. Interestingly, only 55% of the dogs that tested positive were actually experiencing diarrhea at the time. The study revealed that dogs who ate raw food or had been given antibiotics were more likely to test positive. Overall, the findings suggest that Salmonella infections in pets have decreased over the years, but pet owners should be cautious about feeding raw diets.

People also search for: dog diarrhea causes · Salmonella in dogs treatment · raw food diet risks for dogs

Abstract

Eleven laboratories collaborated to determine the periodic prevalence ofin a population of dogs and cats in the United States visiting veterinary clinics. Fecal samples (2,965) solicited from 11 geographically dispersed veterinary testing laboratories were collected in 36 states between January 2012 and April 2014 and tested using a harmonized method. The overall study prevalence ofin cats (3 of 542) was <1%. The prevalence in dogs (60 of 2,422) was 2.5%. Diarrhea was present in only 55% of positive dogs; however, 3.8% of the all diarrheic dogs were positive, compared with 1.8% of the nondiarrheic dogs.-positive dogs were significantly more likely to have consumed raw food (= 0.01), to have consumed probiotics (= 0.002), or to have been given antibiotics (= 0.01). Rural dogs were also more likely to bepositive than urban (= 0.002) or suburban (= 0.001) dogs. In the 67 isolates, 27 unique serovars were identified, with three dogs having two serovars present. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 66 isolates revealed that only four of the isolates were resistant to one or more antibiotics. Additional characterization of the 66 isolates was done using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Sequence data compared well to resistance phenotypic data and were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). This study suggests an overall decline in prevalence of-positive dogs and cats over the last decades and identifies consumption of raw food as a major risk factor forinfection. Of note is that almost half of the-positive animals were clinically nondiarrheic.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28202802/