Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Early urine test spots kidney disease in hyperthyroid cats
By Lapointe, C et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2008·Companion Animal Research Group of the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Canada·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase index as an early biomarker for chronic kidney disease in cats with hyperthyroidism.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of hyperthyroid cats were evaluated for kidney health using a new urine test called the N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase index (NAG(i)). This test showed promise in identifying cats at risk for chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially when combined with other tests. After treatment with methimazole, the NAG(i) levels decreased in cats that did not have kidney disease, suggesting the test could help monitor kidney function during treatment. While the test alone didn't clearly distinguish between healthy and sick cats, it may assist veterinarians in adjusting treatments for hyperthyroid cats.
People also search for: cat hyperthyroidism kidney disease test · NAG index for cats · methimazole treatment for hyperthyroid cats
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperthyroid cats are at risk of developing azotemic chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diagnostic tools currently used to screen for CKD in hyperthyroid cats are either unreliable or impractical. HYPOTHESIS: Urine N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase index (NAG(i)) is a good biomarker for azotemic CKD in hyperthyroid cats. ANIMALS: Twenty-four newly diagnosed nonazotemic hyperthyroid cats and 10 healthy cats. METHODS: All cats were evaluated for hyperthyroidism at baseline. Hyperthyroid cats were treated with methimazole and reevaluated once euthyroid. At the end of the study, cats were divided into 3 groups: healthy cats, nonazotemic, and azotemic euthyroid cats. Baseline group characteristics were compared to predict azotemic CKD. The influence of treatment on NAG(i) was evaluated. RESULTS: Baseline NAG(i) was significantly different among groups (P= .004). Azotemic cats had a higher median value (13.12 U/g) when compared with healthy cats (1.38 U/g). With NAG(i) >2.76 U/g, negative and positive predictive values for development of azotemia were 77.7 and 50%, whereas the combination of a urine specific gravity (USG) <or=1.035 and T(4) >7.80 microg/dL enhanced predictive values to 88.9 and 83.3%, respectively. NAG(i) values decreased significantly over time in treated nonazotemic cats. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Baseline NAG(i) did not differentiate azotemic from nonazotemic euthyroid cats. NAG(i) could be used to assess renal function during medical therapy allowing the clinician to adjust methimazole dosage accordingly. The combination of USG and T(4) could optimize identification of appropriate candidates for permanent treatment of hyperthyroidism.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18700858/