PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Nebulized lidocaine reduces airway problems in cats with asthma

By Nafe, Laura A et al.·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2013·Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Nebulized lidocaine blunts airway hyper-responsiveness in experimental feline asthma.

Species:
cat
Feline asthmaBreathing & coughCats

Plain-English summary

A group of cats with asthma were given nebulized lidocaine to see if it could help their breathing problems. While the treatment was safe and well-tolerated, it didn't significantly reduce the number of eosinophils (a type of white blood cell involved in inflammation) in their airways. However, it did improve airflow in these asthmatic cats, suggesting it could be a helpful addition to other treatments rather than a standalone solution. Overall, lidocaine may provide some benefits for cats suffering from asthma without causing additional inflammation.

People also search for: cat asthma treatment · nebulized lidocaine for cats · feline asthma breathing problems

Abstract

Nebulized lidocaine may be a corticosteroid-sparing drug in human asthmatics, reducing airway resistance and peripheral blood eosinophilia. We hypothesized that inhaled lidocaine would be safe in healthy and experimentally asthmatic cats, diminishing airflow limitation and eosinophilic airway inflammation in the latter population. Healthy (n = 5) and experimentally asthmatic (n = 9) research cats were administered 2 weeks of nebulized lidocaine (2 mg/kg q8h) or placebo (saline) followed by a 2-week washout and crossover to the alternate treatment. Cats were anesthetized to measure the response to inhaled methacholine (MCh) after each treatment. Placebo and doubling doses of methacholine (0.0625-32.0000 mg/ml) were delivered and results were expressed as the concentration of MCh increasing baseline airway resistance by 200% (EC200Raw). Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed after each treatment and eosinophil numbers quantified. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) % eosinophils and EC200Raw within groups after each treatment were compared using a paired t-test (P <0.05 significant). No adverse effects were noted. In healthy cats, lidocaine did not significantly alter BALF eosinophilia or the EC200Raw. There was no difference in %BALF eosinophils in asthmatic cats treated with lidocaine (36&#xb1;10%) or placebo (33 &#xb1; 6%). However, lidocaine increased the EC200Raw compared with placebo 10 &#xb1; 2 versus 5 &#xb1; 1 mg/ml; P = 0.043). Chronic nebulized lidocaine was well-tolerated in all cats, and lidocaine did not induce airway inflammation or airway hyper-responsiveness in healthy cats. Lidocaine decreased airway response to MCh in asthmatic cats without reducing airway eosinophilia, making it unsuitable for monotherapy. However, lidocaine may serve as a novel adjunctive therapy in feline asthmatics with beneficial effects on airflow obstruction.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23392613/