PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Nucleated red blood cells as a survival sign in very sick cats

By Dörfelt, René et al.·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2025·LMU Small Animal Clinic, Germany·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Nucleated red blood cells in critically ill cats.

Species:
cat
Brain & nervesCats

Plain-English summary

A group of critically ill cats were examined for the presence of nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) in their blood, which some veterinarians thought might indicate how serious their condition was. Out of 94 cats studied, 25 had NRBCs, but this did not help predict which cats would survive after 28 days. Most of the cats had serious health issues like infections or cancer, and unfortunately, 76 of them did not survive. The study found that while NRBCs were present in some cats, they did not provide useful information about the chances of recovery.

People also search for: cat blood test results · critically ill cat prognosis · nucleated red blood cells in cats

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study investigated the presence of nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) in the circulation as a prognostic factor in critically ill cats.MethodsCritically ill cats were prospectively included over 11 months if they fulfilled at least 3/4 systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria or if their general condition was severely reduced. All cats underwent a physical examination and blood collection for haematological and clinical chemical parameters, including NRBCs at admission and during hospitalisation. Outcome was defined as survival to 28 days after discharge from hospital. For manual microscopic NRBC count, 300 nucleated cells were examined and recorded as relative NRBC count (rNRBC). Absolute NRBC (aNRBC) numbers were calculated from those values: aNRBC = rNRBC × (white blood cell [WBC]/100).ResultsNRBCs, and most commonly metarubricytes, were detected in 25/94 critically ill cats. Primary underlying diseases were infectious (n = 10), neoplastic (n = 33), metabolic (n = 29), cardiovascular (n = 10), neurological (n = 5) and miscellaneous (n = 7). A positive correlation of absolute NRBCs with corrected WBCs ( = 0.448) was observed. After 28 days, 18 cats were still alive and 76 cats did not survive. Mortality did not differ between NRBC-positive and NRBC-negative cats ( = 0.641). Absolute NRBC count was 0.382 × 10/l (range 0.032-28.990) and did not differ between survivors and non-survivors. Anaemia was not associated with NRBCs. All but one of the six NRBC-positive cats on day 2 did not survive.Conclusions and relevanceNRBCs can be observed in the blood of critically ill cats; however, their occurrence did not have a prognostic value.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41044800/