PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Outcomes after modified cranial closing wedge ostectomy in dogs

By Kovacs, Jenny M et al.·Published in Veterinary research communications·2024·Lunds Djursjukhus Evidensia·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Objective and owner-reported outcomes after modified cranial closing wedge ostectomy: a case series.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 15 dogs with knee problems due to cranial cruciate ligament disease underwent a specific type of surgery called cranial closing wedge ostectomy to help improve their condition. After the surgery, most dogs showed some improvement in their ability to use their legs, although many still experienced mild to moderate arthritis symptoms. However, there were also significant complications in nearly half of the cases shortly after the surgery. Overall, while the surgery can lead to better limb use, pet owners should be aware of the potential for complications and discuss the risks with their veterinarian.

People also search for: dog knee surgery recovery · cranial cruciate ligament disease treatment · dog arthritis symptoms after surgery

Abstract

Immediate and longer-term outcomes of a cranial closing wedge ostectomy variant for management of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease were assessed in this single-center retrospective consecutive study. Records and radiographs were retrieved and assessed by three independent observers to evaluate tibial plateau angle, anatomical-mechanical axis angle, tibial tuberosity distalization, and mechanical axis length before and after surgery. Kinetic gait analysis and owner questionnaires were used to assess clinical outcomes. Seventeen stifles from fifteen dogs were evaluated radiographically. Mean error from target tibial plateau angle was 0.4 degrees. Anatomical-mechanical axis angles reduced from mean 2.9 degrees preoperatively to mean - 0.9 degrees postoperatively. Tibial tuberosity distalization was mean 5.0% of mechanical axis length, and mean reduction in mechanical axis length was 0.1%. Increased tibial plateau angles were noted in 8/17 stifles, with a mean of 9.6 degrees at short-term follow-up. Major complications were observed in 9/17 stifles. Long term follow-up (mean 832 days) was obtained with gait analysis in 8/15 dogs and with questionnaire in 11/15. Most dogs (9/11) were weakly to moderately affected by osteoarthritis symptoms. All values for peak vertical force and vertical impulse normalized to body weight exceeded local lower reference limits for normal dogs, indicating acceptable limb use. Satisfactory immediate and long-term clinical outcomes appear to be possible with this technique, but the high incidence of shorter-term complications may caution against the technique or the fixation and management described here.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37978161/