Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Eye pressure and pupil changes in healthy cats after bimatoprost drops
By Regnier, Alain et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2006·Department of Clinical Sciences, France·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Ocular effects of topical 0.03% bimatoprost solution in normotensive feline eyes.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of nine healthy European Shorthair cats received a medication called bimatoprost, applied as eye drops, to see how it affected their eye pressure and pupil size. The cats were treated for five days, with one eye receiving the bimatoprost and the other eye getting artificial tears as a control. While the treatment did not lower the eye pressure significantly, it did cause the pupils in the treated eyes to become noticeably smaller. Fortunately, there were no serious side effects observed from the treatment.
People also search for: cat eye drops bimatoprost · why are my cat's pupils small · cat eye pressure treatment
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The current study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of topically applied bimatoprost, an ocular hypotensive lipid, on intraocular pressure (IOP) and pupil size (PS) in healthy cats. ANIMAL STUDIED: Nine European Shorthair cats free from clinically relevant ocular abnormalities were used in the study. PROCEDURES: Pretreatment baseline measurements of IOP and PS were obtained bilaterally at 8 am, 2 pm, and 8 pm for five consecutive days (days 1 to 5). Then the cats received one drop twice daily (10 am and 6 pm) of bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% (Lumigantrade mark, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA USA), in one randomly selected eye and one drop of artificial tears in the fellow eye (control eye) for 5 days (days 6 to 10). Values for IOP and PS were obtained under the same conditions as in the pretreatment phase. The potential for ocular irritation following bimatoprost application was also evaluated. RESULTS: During the pretreatment period, the mean IOP and mean PS were not significantly different between the eyes subsequently treated with bimatoprost and those subsequently determined as controls. During the treatment period, the mean IOP in bimatoprost-treated eyes was not significantly lower than in control eyes (14.2+/-2.3 vs. 14.5+/-2.8 mmHg). Mean IOP in control eyes was not significantly changed at any time during the study period. A marked reduction of PS was seen in all bimatoprost-treated eyes, but no other clinically relevant side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Twice daily topical applications of bimatoprost produced miosis but had no significant effect on IOP in healthy cats.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16409244/