Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Open-chest CPR improves survival and neurologic outcome following cardiac arrest.
By Benson, Don M et al.·Published in Resuscitation·2005·Department of Emergency Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs experienced cardiac arrest and were treated with either open-chest CPR (OC-CPR) or closed-chest CPR (CC-CPR) to see which method would help them survive and recover better. All dogs that received OC-CPR were successfully resuscitated and showed no signs of brain injury after 72 hours. In contrast, only three dogs that received CC-CPR survived, and they had varying degrees of neurological issues. This study suggests that open-chest CPR may be a more effective treatment for dogs experiencing cardiac arrest.
People also search for: dog cardiac arrest treatment · CPR for dogs · open-chest CPR dogs · dog survival after cardiac arrest
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if 15 min of open-chest cardiac massage (OC-CPR) versus closed-chest compressions (CC-CPR) improves 72-h survival and neurologic outcome (behavioral and histologic) after 5 min of untreated cardiac arrest. METHODS: Mongrel dogs were anesthetized and instrumented. Cardiac arrest was induced by KCl injection and after a 5-min period of non-intervention, dogs were randomized to receive either CC-CPR (N = 7) or OC-CPR (N = 5) performed for 15 min. The dogs were then resuscitated and physiologic data was recorded. Surviving dogs were scored at 72 h using canine neurodeficit score of Safar et al. (NDS; 0 = behaviorally normal, 500 = brain death). Dogs that could not be resuscitated or died before 72 h were assigned a score of 500. Brain histology was performed on all survivors. RESULTS: All OC-CPR dogs were successfully resuscitated and were behaviorally normal at 72 h (NDS = 0). Histology in OC-CPR dogs showed little to no injury. Only three out of the seven CC-CPR dogs survived to 72 h. Of the survivors, one dog exhibited minor ataxia (NDS = 15), and two had incapacitating deficits (both NDS = 180). Two dogs died within 24 h after extubation, and one could not be resuscitated and the other could not be weaned from the ventilator (each NDS = 500). Histology of the CC-CPR survivors revealed moderate to severe lesions. NDS between groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0079). CONCLUSION: In our canine model of cardiac arrest, OC-CPR significantly improved 72-h survival and neurologic outcome when compared to CC-CPR.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15680532/