PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Open-chest CPR improves survival and neurologic outcome following cardiac arrest.

Journal:
Resuscitation
Year:
2005
Authors:
Benson, Don M et al.
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine · United States
Species:
dog

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if 15 min of open-chest cardiac massage (OC-CPR) versus closed-chest compressions (CC-CPR) improves 72-h survival and neurologic outcome (behavioral and histologic) after 5 min of untreated cardiac arrest. METHODS: Mongrel dogs were anesthetized and instrumented. Cardiac arrest was induced by KCl injection and after a 5-min period of non-intervention, dogs were randomized to receive either CC-CPR (N = 7) or OC-CPR (N = 5) performed for 15 min. The dogs were then resuscitated and physiologic data was recorded. Surviving dogs were scored at 72 h using canine neurodeficit score of Safar et al. (NDS; 0 = behaviorally normal, 500 = brain death). Dogs that could not be resuscitated or died before 72 h were assigned a score of 500. Brain histology was performed on all survivors. RESULTS: All OC-CPR dogs were successfully resuscitated and were behaviorally normal at 72 h (NDS = 0). Histology in OC-CPR dogs showed little to no injury. Only three out of the seven CC-CPR dogs survived to 72 h. Of the survivors, one dog exhibited minor ataxia (NDS = 15), and two had incapacitating deficits (both NDS = 180). Two dogs died within 24 h after extubation, and one could not be resuscitated and the other could not be weaned from the ventilator (each NDS = 500). Histology of the CC-CPR survivors revealed moderate to severe lesions. NDS between groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0079). CONCLUSION: In our canine model of cardiac arrest, OC-CPR significantly improved 72-h survival and neurologic outcome when compared to CC-CPR.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15680532/