PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Essential oil shampoo vs miconazole for fungal coat infection in cats

By Nardoni, Simona et al.·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2017·1 Department of Veterinary Science, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Open-field study comparing an essential oil-based shampoo with miconazole/chlorhexidine for haircoat disinfection in cats with spontaneous microsporiasis.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of cats with a fungal skin infection called microsporiasis were treated with either an essential oil-based shampoo or a traditional shampoo containing miconazole and chlorhexidine, along with oral medication. All cats were treated with oral itraconazole and washed twice a week with their respective shampoos. By the end of the treatment period, all cats were free of the infection, and both treatments worked similarly well. The essential oil shampoo was well-tolerated and appreciated by the owners, making it a promising natural alternative for treating this condition.

People also search for: cat skin infection treatment · essential oil shampoo for cats · microsporiasis in cats · miconazole shampoo for cats

Abstract

Objectives The goal of the present study was to compare the antifungal efficacy of an essential oil (EO) shampoo proven to be effective against Microsporum canis with miconazole/chlorhexidine for topical haircoat disinfection in cats treated concurrently with oral itraconazole. Methods Cats received treatment with oral itraconazole (Itrafungol) at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day pulse administration for 1 week, every 2 weeks for at least 6 weeks and were washed twice a week with a neutral shampoo with added EOs of Thymus serpyllum (2%), Origanum vulgare and Rosmarinus officinalis (5% each) for the period of systemic treatment. This protocol was compared with a conventional treatment (oral itraconazole + 2% miconazole/2% chlorhexidine shampoo). Results The treatment was well tolerated and adverse effects were not recorded. All cats were clinically negative at week 11. With respect to animals with extensive lesions, the speed of resolution was higher in cats with focal lesions. The animals showing diffuse lesions required more than a course of treatment to achieve a mycological cure. There was no significant difference between the number of weeks to obtain mycological cure for cats treated with EOs and animals treated conventionally. Conclusions and relevance The treatment appeared to be effective and well appreciated by the owners. The use of shampoo with the added EOs of T serpyllum, O vulgare and R officinalis would seem an interesting, natural alternative to conventional topical treatment.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26783019/