Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
What affects first-time IV catheter success in emergency dogs
By Singleton, Leaundra et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2025·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Operator experience and easily identifiable veins predict first-time intravenous catheterization success rates in dogs in an emergency room.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study found that when dogs need an intravenous (IV) catheter for emergency treatment, the chances of successful insertion on the first try are higher if the veins are easy to see or feel. In this case, 85.6% of the catheters were successfully placed on the first attempt, with the best results coming from the cephalic vein. Veterinary technicians had a higher success rate compared to veterinarians, and those with more experience inserting catheters were more likely to succeed. This suggests that having skilled technicians perform these procedures could help improve outcomes for dogs with difficult venous access.
People also search for: dog IV catheter success rate · emergency vet IV insertion · why is my dog getting an IV · dog vein visibility for catheter · technician vs veterinarian IV placement success
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess factors associated with first-time successful IV catheter (IVC) insertion in dogs presenting to an emergency room and to describe the reasons for IVC insertion failure. METHODS: This prospective study evaluated dogs requiring IVC insertion over a 3-month period. Variables assessed included vein utilized, catheter size, reason for insertion, operator performing the catheterization and their related experience, as well as whether veins were visible or palpable. RESULTS: There were 372 catheters inserted in 359 dogs. Of the catheters where insertion success was documented, 85.6% (309 of 361) were successfully inserted on the first attempt with the greatest number of successful catheters (96%; 298 of 309) inserted in a cephalic vein. Veterinary technicians had the highest first-time success rate (87.6%; 248 of 283), while veterinarians had the lowest (75%; 15 of 20), although this difference was not statistically significant. The first-time insertion success was more likely when the operator had inserted over 500 catheters previously (OR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.59 to 7.93). Vein visibility (OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.55 to 8.37) and palpability (OR, 3.64; 95% CI, 1.39 to 9.53) were also associated with first-time insertion success. Veins resistant to catheter advancement, operator inexperience, and patient hypotension were the most reported reasons by operators for insertion failure. CONCLUSIONS: Greater operator experience and easily identifiable veins (visible and/or palpable) significantly increase the likelihood of first-time insertion in dogs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Providing veterinary technicians with more opportunities to perform IV insertion could improve success rates, especially in cases of difficult venous access.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40645223/