Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Opportunities for veterinary engagement to improve aquaculture production and the health of farmed fish in the North Central Region of the United States.
- Journal:
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
- Year:
- 2025
- Authors:
- Kebus, Myron et al.
- Affiliation:
- College of Veterinary Medicine · United States
Plain-English summary
This study looked at how fish farmers in the North Central Region of the United States view and use veterinary services to keep their fish healthy. Researchers interviewed 24 fish farmers between April and October 2023 to understand their needs better. They found that while most farmers (67%) have to get their fish inspected regularly due to regulations, only about half (46%) have a relationship with a local fish veterinarian. Additionally, many farmers are not taking advantage of preventive health measures, like having biosecurity plans or vaccinating their fish. Overall, the study suggests that there is a significant opportunity for veterinarians to engage more with fish farmers to improve fish health and production.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate fish farmer perspectives on the use of veterinary services and preventative fish health measures. METHODS: A semistructured interview questionnaire was developed to better understand veterinary opportunities and the fish health needs of fish farmers in the North Central Region (NCR) of the US. From April to October 2023, we conducted 24 interviews with fish farmers, representing the diversity of production sectors in the region. Data from this observational study were organized and analyzed with the use of descriptive and qualitative approaches. RESULTS: Among interviewed fish farmers, regulatory fish health inspections were the most common fish health activity in the NCR, with 67% of farmers reporting the need to perform inspections annually. Although fish health inspections are a leading reason for engagement with fish health professionals, only 46% of farmers reported having an existing relationship with a local fish veterinarian. Voluntary, nonregulatory production medicine practices were relatively low, with only 29% of farmers reporting the use of written biosecurity plans, 13% vaccinating fish, and 4% using veterinary feed directives for antibiotic use. CONCLUSIONS: We found engagement between fish health professionals and fish farmers to be low compared to other animal production industries. Most fish health activities in the NCR involving fish health professionals has been a consequence of regulatory inspections for select pathogens for fish movement, with less than half of the interviewed producers consulting with a fish health professional for nonregulatory support. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There are many fish farmers in the NCR who underutilize or do not use veterinary services, presenting an opportunity for veterinary engagement to improve the production and health of farmed fish. The results of this study provide insight into the needs and perspectives of fish farmers.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40250477/