Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Oral steroids reduce allergy shot benefits in cats with asthma
By Chang, Chee-hoon et al.·Published in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2013·Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Oral glucocorticoids diminish the efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy in experimental feline asthma.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of cats with asthma were treated with allergen-specific immunotherapy (RIT) to help manage their condition, but some were also given oral glucocorticoids (prednisolone) to control severe symptoms. The study found that while the oral glucocorticoids helped initially, they seemed to reduce the effectiveness of the immunotherapy over time, leading to increased airway inflammation. Inhaled glucocorticoids were suggested as a better option since they did not have the same negative impact on the immunotherapy. This means that if your cat is receiving immunotherapy for asthma, it might be worth discussing inhaled medications with your vet instead of oral ones.
People also search for: cat asthma treatment · glucocorticoids for cats · feline immunotherapy effectiveness · inhaled vs oral steroids for cats
Abstract
Allergen-specific rush immunotherapy (RIT) shows promise in treating asthma; however, pet cats will likely require at least initial concurrent glucocorticoids (GCs) to control serious clinical signs. How the immunosuppressive effects of GCs would impact RIT in cats is unknown. The hypothesis of this study was that oral, but not inhaled GCs will diminish the efficacy of RIT in experimental feline asthma. Cats (n=6/group) were sensitized using Bermuda grass allergen (BGA) and randomized to receive BGA-specific RIT for 9 months with an oral GC (prednisolone 10mg daily), inhaled GC (fluticasone 220 μg twice daily), or placebo administered for the first 6 months. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) percent eosinophils and other immunological assays were performed. Eosinophilic airway inflammation was suppressed in all groups at month 6 of RIT (group mean ± SD, 5 ± 2%, 13 ± 4%, and 7 ± 2% for oral GC, inhaled GC, and placebo, respectively; P=0.291). BALF percent eosinophils significantly increased over time only in oral GC/RIT cats between months 6 and 9 (P=0.031). Placebo/RIT cats had significant decreases over time in BGA-specific serum IgE (P=0.031). Concentration of interleukin (IL)-5 in BALF significantly increased over time in inhaled GC/RIT cats (P=0.031). No significant differences were found between groups at month 6 or over time in each group for BGA-specific lymphocyte blastogenesis, percent blood T regulatory cells, or number of IL-10-producing cells. Given the significant increase of airway eosinophilia over time in RIT cats initially treated with an oral GC, inhaled GCs might be better for dampening eosinophilic inflammation until RIT normalizes the dysregulated immune system.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23434218/