PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Oral melphalan treatment for dogs with relapsed lymphoma

By Mastromauro, M. L. et al.·Published in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology·2017·College of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina·View original on Crossref

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Oral melphalan for the treatment of relapsed canine lymphoma

Species:
dog
LymphomaStomach & digestionDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with relapsed lymphoma were treated with oral melphalan, a medication that is easy to give and relatively inexpensive. Out of 19 dogs, about 32% showed some improvement or stable disease after treatment, but the benefits were short-lived, lasting between 14 to 34 days for those that responded. Most dogs tolerated the medication well, although some experienced mild side effects, particularly related to their blood counts. While melphalan may not be a long-term solution, it could be a viable option for dogs with limited treatment choices left.

People also search for: dog lymphoma treatment options · oral melphalan for dogs · side effects of melphalan in dogs

Abstract

Oral melphalan has been included in multi‐agent rescue protocols for canine lymphoma but its activity as a single‐agent for this purpose has not been established. Inexpensive cost, ease of administration and tolerability make oral melphalan an attractive candidate for single‐agent rescue therapy of canine lymphoma. Retrospective evaluation of 19 cases of relapsed canine lymphoma treated with oral melphalan was performed. Melphalan was primarily administered (n = 16) via a high dose protocol (HDM) with a median dosage of 19.4 mg m−2. Fifteen dogs (78.9%) were treated concurrently with corticosteroids. Response evaluation was possible for all dogs with a calculated overall clinical benefit (partial response [PR] + stable disease [SD]) of 31.6% (PR3/19;SD3/19). Times to progression following melphalan (TTP‐M) were 14, 24 and 34 days for responders and 20, 28 and 103 days for dogs experiencingSD. Twelve of 17 dogs evaluable for toxicity experienced an adverse event (AE) with only 3 dogs experiencing a gradeIIIor higherAE. Haematologic toxicity was common (11/17) while gastrointestinal toxicity was rare (1/17). Although treatment resulted in limited clinical benefit and non‐durable responses, oral melphalan was well‐tolerated and may be a reasonable rescue option in cases where minimal effective agents remain.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.12356