PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Recovery chances for paraplegic dogs with spinal cord injury

By Togawa, Go et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2024·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Outcome in paraplegic dogs with or without pain perception due to thoracolumbar fibrocartilaginous embolic myelopathy or acute non-compressive nucleus pulposus extrusion.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with severe back injuries, specifically those with fibrocartilaginous embolic myelopathy (FCEM) or acute non-compressive nucleus pulposus extrusion (ANNPE), were studied to see how many could regain the ability to walk. Among the 31 dogs, those that could still feel pain in their legs had a much better chance of walking again—about 64% recovered—while only 8% of those that couldn't feel pain regained mobility. This suggests that if a dog is paraplegic and cannot feel pain, the chances of recovery are significantly lower.

People also search for: dog back injury treatment · dog paraplegia recovery · fibrocartilaginous embolic myelopathy prognosis

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fibrocartilaginous embolic myelopathy (FCEM) and acute non-compressive nucleus pulposus extrusion (ANNPE) are common causes of acute spinal cord injury in dogs. Outcome among paraplegic deep pain positive (DPP) and deep pain negative (DPN) dogs with either condition and factors influencing recovery have not been clearly established. METHODS: Dogs with thoracolumbar FCEM or ANNPE resulting in paraplegia presenting to university hospitals between 2012 and 2022 were retrospectively included. Diagnosis of FCEM or ANNPE was based on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Outcome was defined as successful (recovery of independent ambulation) or unsuccessful (non-ambulatory ≥3 months following diagnosis or at the time of death/euthanasia). Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate associations between clinical or imaging variables and outcome. RESULTS: Thirty-one dogs were included. In total, 14 dogs were initially paraplegic DPP (8 FCEM, 6 ANNPE) and 17 dogs were paraplegic DPN (11 FCEM, 6 ANNPE). Outcome was available for 26 dogs (14 DPP, 12 DPN) with a median follow-up time of 182 days (range 0-2,311) including 2 dogs euthanized at the time of diagnosis; 1 of 12 DPN dogs (8.3%) regained independent ambulation, whereas 9 of 14 DPP dogs (64.3%) regained independent ambulation. DPN dogs had a significantly higher risk of not regaining independent ambulation compared with DPP dogs (OR: 47.40, 95% CI: 2.09-1073.99). No other variables were associated with outcome. CONCLUSION: While recovery of ambulation was possible, these results confirm that the absence of pain perception is a useful negative prognostic indicator in dogs with severe thoracolumbar FCEM or ANNPE.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38784658/