Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Success of conjunctival flap surgery for dog corneal wounds
By Dorbandt, Daniel M et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2015·Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Outcome of conjunctival flap repair for corneal defects with and without an acellular submucosa implant in 73 canine eyes.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A 7-year-old Labrador retriever with a deep corneal wound underwent surgery to repair the damage using a conjunctival flap. Some dogs received a flap alone, while others had a flap with an additional implant. Both methods were highly successful, with 93% of the dogs recovering well and maintaining vision after the procedure. Interestingly, the dogs with the implant were able to stop using antibiotics sooner. Overall, both surgical options worked well, and no serious complications were reported after surgery.
People also search for: dog eye surgery recovery · corneal wound treatment in dogs · conjunctival flap for dog eye problems
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report and compare the success rate of a conjunctival pedicle flap (CPF) alone vs. a CPF with an underlying acellular submucosa implant for the repair of deep or perforating corneal wounds in dogs. PROCEDURES: Records of 69 dogs (73 eyes) receiving a CPF with or without an acellular submucosa implant between 2004 and 2012 were reviewed. Successful outcome was defined as a comfortable eye with vision at the last post-operative evaluation. Age, breed, underlying corneal disease, surgical time, lesion characteristics, topical therapies, and postoperative complications were investigated. RESULTS: Groups consisted of dogs that had a CPF alone (n = 37) and dogs that had a CPF plus an acellular submucosa implant (n = 36). Age, lesion size, surgical time, and time to discontinuation of topical anti-proteolytic medications was not significant between groups. Topical antibiotic use was terminated 13 days sooner (P ≤ 0.01) in dogs with an acellular submucosa implant. The combined success rate of all corneal wounds was 93% with success rate of corneal perforations, descemetoceles, and deep stromal wounds being 89%, 95%, and 100%, respectively. There was no difference in overall success rate between groups. Increasing age was associated with a negative outcome (P ≤ 0.01). Lesion size, presence of a corneal perforation, and concurrent keratoconjunctivitis sicca was not associated with a negative outcome. CONCLUSIONS: A comparable success rate is achieved for deep or perforating corneal wounds stabilized with a CPF alone vs. a CPF plus acellular submucosa. Glaucoma, persistent uveitis, and cataract formation were not reported as post-operative complications in this study population.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25047064/