PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Outcomes of subcutaneous ureteral bypass for ureter blockage in dogs

By Milligan, M L et al.·Published in The Journal of small animal practice·2020·Department of Interventional Radiology and Endoscopy, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Outcome of SUB placement for the treatment of benign ureteral obstruction in dogs: nine dogs and 12 renal units (2013 to 2017).

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of nine dogs with ureteral obstructions, often caused by kidney stones or previous stent issues, underwent a procedure called subcutaneous ureteral bypass to relieve their symptoms. The surgery was successful for all dogs, and they showed improvement in kidney function after three months, with no immediate complications. However, some dogs experienced long-term issues, such as mineral buildup in the bypass devices, which required replacements. Overall, the dogs had a good survival rate, with many living over two years after the procedure.

People also search for: dog ureteral obstruction treatment · subcutaneous ureteral bypass for dogs · dog kidney stones surgery · urinary tract infection in dogs · dog kidney function improvement

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe a group of dogs with benign ureteral obstruction(s) treated by subcutaneous ureteral bypass and report the intra-operative, peri-operative, short- and long-term outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of medical records of dogs that underwent subcutaneous ureteral bypass. RESULTS: Nine dogs (12 renal units) were included. Causes of obstruction included: ureterolithiasis (n=9) extraluminal compression (n=2), and stricture (n=1). Eleven of 12 ureters had a previously placed stent and required subcutaneous ureteral bypass for: recurrent stricture (n=4), diffuse ureteritis (n=4) or stent migration (n=3). Placement was successful in all renal units and there were no peri-operative or procedure-related deaths. Median hospitalisation time was 3 days. The median creatinine values pre-operatively and 3 month post-operatively were 186 and 106 μmol/L, respectively. No dog had worsening azotaemia in the short-term. The most common long-term complication was mineralisation of six devices, of which four required exchange. All dogs that were infected post-operatively (n=5) had a history of at least one urinary tract infection pre-operatively. One of the nine dogs had a chronic post-operative urinary tract infection and had been chronically infected before placing the bypass. The median survival time was >774 days, with five of nine dogs alive at the time of publication. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Placement of a subcutaneous ureteral bypass was an effective short-term treatment option for benign ureteral obstructions in dogs but there was a high rate of device mineralisation.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32352170/