Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Outcomes of cellophane banding for portosystemic shunts in dogs
By Hunt, Geraldine B et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2004·Faculty of Veterinary Science, Australia·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Outcomes of cellophane banding for congenital portosystemic shunts in 106 dogs and 5 cats.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 106 dogs and 5 cats with congenital portosystemic shunts (abnormal blood vessels that bypass the liver) underwent a procedure called cellophane banding to help correct the issue. While some pets experienced serious complications, including a few fatalities, most of the animals that survived showed significant improvement in their symptoms after surgery. In fact, 84% of the pets tested had normal bile acid levels afterward, indicating that their liver function had improved. Overall, cellophane banding proved to be a safe and effective treatment option for these pets.
People also search for: dog portosystemic shunt treatment · cat liver shunt surgery · congenital shunt in dogs symptoms
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes after cellophane banding of single congenital portosystemic shunts in dogs and cats. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of sequential cases. ANIMALS: One hundred and six dogs and five cats. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for breed, sex, age at surgery, shunt anatomy, results of pre- and postoperative biochemical analysis, development of postligation neurologic dysfunction, portal hypertension or other serious complications, and the owners' perception of their animal's response to surgery. RESULTS: Ninety-five dogs and all 5 cats had extrahepatic shunts. Eleven dogs had intrahepatic shunts. Six dogs (5.5%) died as a result of surgery from portal hypertension (2 dogs), postligation neurologic dysfunction (2), splenic hemorrhage (1) and suspected narcotic overdose (1). Serious complications were more common in dogs with intrahepatic shunts than those with extrahepatic shunts (P=.002). Postligation neurologic dysfunction necessitated treatment in 10 dogs and 1 cat; 8 dogs and the cat survived. Clinical signs attributed to portosystemic shunting resolved or were substantially attenuated in all survivors. Postoperative serum bile acid concentrations or results of ammonia tolerance testing were available for 88 animals; 74 (84%) were normal and 14 (16%) were abnormal. Multiple acquired shunts were documented in two animals. CONCLUSIONS: Cellophane banding is a safe and effective alternative to other methods of attenuation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Slow occlusion of portosystemic shunts using a variety of methods is being evaluated world wide. Cellophane banding is a relatively simple procedure with comparable safety and efficacy to previously reported techniques.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14687183/