Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Dog surgery outcomes after rapid versus delayed GDV treatment
By Lhuillery, Eloïse et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2022·CHV des Cordeliers, France·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Outcomes of dogs undergoing surgery for gastric dilatation volvulus after rapid versus prolonged medical stabilization.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 162 dogs with a serious condition called gastric dilatation volvulus (GDV), where the stomach twists and fills with gas, were treated with surgery after either a quick or a longer period of medical care. The dogs in the quick group had surgery about 2 hours after arriving at the vet, while those in the longer group waited nearly 10 hours. Surprisingly, both groups had similar survival rates after surgery and one month later, suggesting that the timing of surgery may not significantly impact survival. The study highlights the importance of careful monitoring and stabilization before surgery, but more research is needed to understand the best approach for different dogs.
People also search for: dog GDV surgery recovery · gastric torsion treatment for dogs · how long to wait for dog surgery GDV
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of dogs surgically treated for gastric dilatation volvulus (GDV) after rapid versus prolonged medical stabilization. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study, monoinstitutional. SAMPLE POPULATION: One hundred and sixty-two dogs with GDV. METHODS: Dogs presenting with a GDV were allocated to 1 of 2 groups, immediate or delayed. In the immediate group, dogs were stabilized for 90 min prior to undergoing surgery. In the delayed group, dogs underwent surgery after at least 5 h of stabilization. Medical stabilization included gastric decompression and placement of an indwelling nasogastric tube to prevent further gastric dilatation in all dogs. Short-term outcomes were compared between surgical timings by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Dogs (n = 89) in the immediate group underwent surgery a median time of 2.1 h after presentation (range 1.9-2.5 h), whereas those in the delayed surgery group (n = 73) were operated a median time of 9.8 h (range 5.4-13.7 h) after presentation. Survival rates did not differ between dogs undergoing immediate or delayed surgery at discharge (70/89 and 60/73, respectively) or at 1 month postoperatively (68/89 and 55/73, respectively). The degree of gastric torsion was differently distributed between the 2 groups (P = .05). In the immediate group, 19, 52, and 9 dogs had a 0°, 180° and 270° gastric torsion respectively, whereas in the delayed group, 27, 32, and 5 dogs had a 0°, 180° and 270° gastric torsion respectively. Hyperlactatemia 24 h after initiation of fluid therapy was associated with an increased in-hospital mortality risk and at 1 month postoperatively. CONCLUSION: No survival benefit was detected as a result of proceeding to surgery after either a rapid or a prolonged medical stabilization. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The aggressive stabilization and monitoring protocol described here can be considered as an alternative to stabilize dogs with GDV prior to surgery within 13.7 h of presentation. Further research is required to investigate the potential risks and benefits of prolonged over rapid stabilization and to identify candidates for each approach.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34989433/