Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Root canal success rates for fractured upper premolars
By Kwon, Daehyun et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2024·MAY Veterinary Dental Hospital, South Korea·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Outcomes of root canal treatments with three different sealers for 120 fractured maxillary fourth premolar teeth in small-to medium-sized dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 120 small to medium-sized dogs with fractured upper fourth premolar teeth underwent root canal treatment (RCT) to save their teeth instead of extracting them. The dogs were treated using three different types of filling materials, and the overall success rate of the treatments was an impressive 90.83%. Most dogs showed no signs of failure after the procedure, although some had preexisting issues that could affect the outcome. All three filling materials worked similarly well, making RCT a viable option for treating tooth fractures in dogs.
People also search for: dog tooth fracture treatment · root canal for dogs · maxillary fourth premolar dog · dog dental care options
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tooth fracture is one of the most common traumatic maxillofacial injuries in dogs and cats. For fractures with pulp exposure occurring in functionally important teeth, the literature indicates that root canal treatment (RCT) is an effective therapy option that may be the remedy of choice before extraction. The most commonly reported fractures in the United States involve canine teeth; however, fractures of the maxillary fourth premolars are more common in Korea, where there are many small-and medium-sized dogs. RCT mechanically and chemically removes pulp tissue and bacteria (cleaning and shaping) from the infected root canal, and obturates the root canal with filling material to restore tooth functionality without inflammation. Various techniques, instruments, and materials used in humans have been modified for application in veterinary dentistry. METHODS: This study analyzed the results of RCT of the maxillary fourth premolar in 120 small-and medium-sized dogs (weighing less than 25 kg) using three different sealers (silicone-based sealer, bioceramic sealer, and calcium hydroxide-based sealer) through a simple application of the single-cone technique. RESULTS: The overall success rate of RCT in maxillary fourth premolars was 90.83%, with 8.33% no evidence of failure (NEF) and 0.83% failure. DISCUSSION: There were no significant differences between the three different sealers. Furthermore, preexisting periapical lesion (PAL) was reconfirmed as a factor in reducing the success rate of RCT. In addition, the working length and master apical file of each root were analyzed in our study as a novel reference for endodontic veterinarians.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38784660/