Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Partial bladder tumor removal using bipolar sealing in seven dogs
By Milovancev, Milan et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2020·Department of Clinical Sciences·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Partial cystectomy with a bipolar sealing device in seven dogs with naturally occurring bladder tumors.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of seven dogs with bladder tumors underwent surgery to remove part of their bladder using a special sealing device. The surgery was successful for all dogs, but some experienced urine leakage from the surgical site. Most dogs healed well without complications, but one dog needed a second surgery due to a leak that caused fluid in the abdomen. Overall, while the sealing device showed promise, the results varied, and additional sutures were recommended to prevent issues after surgery.
People also search for: dog bladder tumor surgery · bladder cancer treatment in dogs · dog urine leakage after surgery
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of a bipolar sealing device (BSD) for partial cystectomy in dogs undergoing excision of bladder tumors. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, clinical pilot study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Seven client-owned dogs with nontrigonal urinary bladder lesions. METHODS: Dogs underwent a sealed partial cystectomy with a BSD, with or without cystoscopic guidance of the resection. The sealed cystectomy site was oversewn with a single-layer simple continuous pattern with monofilament absorbable suture. RESULTS: Sealed partial cystectomy was successfully performed in all dogs, with a median surgical duration of 69 minutes (range, 50-120). Lesions were located at the apex in six dogs and on the ventral midbody of the bladder in one dog. No urine leakage from the BSD luminal seal was visible prior to suture closure in three dogs, while varying amounts of urine leaked from the sealed site in four dogs. Suture was placed over the seal in grossly normal bladder tissue in six dogs and in the BSD peripheral thermal effect zone in one dog; in this latter dog, revision cystorrhaphy was required 3 days later because of uroabdomen. The other six dogs had no clinical evidence of urinary bladder healing complications. CONCLUSION: The integrity of the seal generated by the BSD tested here on partial cystectomies varied between dogs and was unpredictable. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Sealed partial cystectomy with a BSD may reduce exposure of urinary bladder luminal contents to the surgical site. However, the placement of sutures over the seal and through grossly normal bladder tissue is recommended to prevent postoperative uroabdomen.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32039489/