PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Tick species and infection rates found on pets in British Columbia

By Fraser, Erin et al.·Published in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne·2024·Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Canada·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Passive tick surveillance and detection ofin ticks from companion animals in British Columbia: 2018 to 2020.

Plain-English summary

Ticks were found on companion animals in British Columbia, with a study showing that 85% of the ticks submitted by veterinarians were of species known to spread diseases. While only a small percentage (0.8%) tested positive for infections, it's still crucial for pet owners to be aware that ticks can pose health risks to both pets and humans. This highlights the importance of regular tick checks and preventive measures, especially as tick populations may change due to climate conditions. Keeping your pet protected from ticks can help reduce the risk of tick-borne illnesses.

People also search for: how to prevent ticks on dogs · tick disease in pets · tick removal for cats · signs of tick infection in dogs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to identify tick species and determine prevalence ofinfection in ticks obtained from companion animals in British Columbia. ANIMALS AND SAMPLES: Ticks were submitted by British Columbia veterinarians from client-owned companion animals over a 31-month period. PROCEDURE: Each tick was identified and PCR testing forundertaken on allspecies identified by the Zoonotic Diseases and Emerging Pathogens Section of British Columbia Centre for Disease Control Public Health Laboratory (BCCDC PHL). RESULTS: Overall, 85% (= 300) of ticks submitted werespp., with the majority known to transmitFurthermore, 0.8% (95% confidence interval: 0.094 to 2.78%) of these ticks were PCR-positive for CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although thepositivity rate in this study was low, it remains important for veterinary professionals to inform pet owners that ticks are present and can pose a risk to pets and humans. In eastern North America,infection risk has increased rapidly, underscoring the importance of ongoing surveillance in British Columbia to understand current and future distributions of ticks and tick-borne pathogens, especially in the context of climate change.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38827591/