Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Allergen skin prick test irritation levels in healthy dogs in the USA
By Carnett, Matthew J H & Plant, Jon D·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2018·SkinVet Clinic, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Percutaneous prick test irritant threshold concentrations for eight allergens in healthy nonsedated dogs in the USA.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 20 healthy dogs underwent skin testing to identify their sensitivity to common allergens like pollen and dust mites. The tests showed that 25% of the dogs reacted to certain allergens, with specific dilutions needed for accurate results. For example, two types of pollen could be tested at full strength, while dust mites needed to be diluted for reliable results. This information can help veterinarians better diagnose and treat dogs with allergies, ensuring fewer false positives when testing for sensitivities.
People also search for: dog allergy testing · how to test dog for pollen allergies · dust mite allergy treatment for dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous testing (PT) is preferred to intradermal testing in humans for the in vivo identification of allergen hypersensitivity, but the methodology has not been well described for use in dogs with atopic dermatitis. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To identify the irritant threshold concentrations (ITC) of eight aeroallergens using a commercial prick test device in normal dogs. ANIMALS: Twenty healthy, privately owned dogs. METHODS: Percutaneous testing was performed using the GREERPickSystem (Stallergenes Greer; Lenoir, NC, USA). Five dilutions of glycerinated extracts of Bromis inermis, Sorghum halepense, Chenopodium album, Ambrosia psilostachya, Salix nigra and Acer negundo, as well as four dilutions of Dermatophagoides farinae and D. pteronyssinus were included. Glycerinated histamine (6 mg/ml) and glycerin/Coca's solution were used for the positive and negative controls, respectively. Orthogonal wheal diameters were measured for each test site every 5 min for 25 min. Reactions were considered significant when the average wheal diameter was equal to or greater than the mean of the positive and negative controls. RESULTS: Significant reactions were noted in five of 20 (25%) of dogs. The ITC (≤10% of dogs reacting) were 1:20 w/v for B. inermis and S. nigra, 1:400 w/v for D. farinae and 1:200 w/v for D. pteronyssinus. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: These results suggest that the pollen allergens evaluated in this study can be used for PT at their undiluted concentration (1:20 w/v) with a reasonable assurance of few false positive reactions in dogs. Dust mites require dilution for testing at the ITC.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29315920/