PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

AI software detects heart failure in dogs and cats accurately

By Ellingsberg, Lauren et al.·Published in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association·2026·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Performance of an Artificial Intelligence Convolution Neural Network Software for the Detection of Confirmed Heart Failure in Dogs and Cats.

Plain-English summary

A study tested an artificial intelligence program designed to help veterinarians detect heart failure in dogs and cats using X-rays. The AI was able to accurately identify signs of heart failure, such as an enlarged heart and changes in blood vessels, with high sensitivity rates—87% for dogs and 96% for cats. However, when it came to combining these findings to conclude heart failure, the AI's effectiveness dropped significantly. While the AI can assist in identifying heart issues, veterinarians still need to use their expertise to interpret the results properly.

People also search for: dog heart failure symptoms · cat heart disease diagnosis · AI for detecting heart problems in pets

Abstract

An independent dataset was used to retrospectively test the ability of an artificial intelligence (AI) program to detect radiographic signs of right or left heart failure (HF) and combine these findings to make a radiographic assessment of HF in dogs and cats. Experimental groups included 105 confirmed cases of heart disease in failure and a control group of 40 confirmed cases of heart disease not in failure. The program had an 87.04% sensitivity and an 80% specificity for radiographically concluding HF in dogs. Compared to true findings, the program had a 98% sensitivity in detecting an interstitial pattern, 100% sensitivity in detecting cardiomegaly, and 95% sensitivity in detecting a vascular pattern among other findings. In cats, the program had a 96% sensitivity in detecting an interstitial pattern, 96% sensitivity in detecting cardiomegaly, and 94% sensitivity in detecting a vascular pattern, among other findings. Despite this high sensitivity performance, the program only combines these findings to conclude HF with a sensitivity of 9.8% and specificity of 95%. The AI software had a similar success rate compared to radiologists in identifying the individual findings of HF in both species. This software has reached a level of sophistication to identify the different abnormalities as accurately as a large radiology group and also combine these findings and arrive at the radiographic conclusion of HF in dogs. The performance of this program in cats highlights the importance for veterinarians to utilize their medical knowledge to interpret the AI report like any other ancillary diagnostic test.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41689779/