PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Accuracy of portable and benchtop glucose meters in pet rabbits

By Selleri, Paolo et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2014·Clinica per Animali Esotici, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Performance of two portable meters and a benchtop analyzer for blood glucose concentration measurement in rabbits.

Species:
rabbit

Plain-English summary

A study looked at how well different blood glucose meters worked for measuring blood sugar levels in pet rabbits. The human portable blood glucose meter was found to be reliable for testing, while the veterinary portable meter often gave higher readings than actual, which could lead to incorrect treatment decisions. The benchtop analyzer performed the best overall, providing accurate results regardless of the rabbits' blood characteristics. If you need to monitor your rabbit's blood sugar, the human meter could be a good option when a more advanced analyzer isn't available.

People also search for: rabbit blood sugar testing · portable glucose meter for rabbits · rabbit diabetes treatment

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate performance of a human portable blood glucose meter (PBGM), a veterinary PBGM, and a veterinary benchtop analyzer for measuring blood glucose concentration in rabbits and to evaluate the effect of sample characteristics on their performance. DESIGN: Observational prospective cross-sectional study. SAMPLE: Blood samples from 89 pet rabbits. PROCEDURES: Blood glucose concentration was measured with a human PBGM (n = 89 rabbits), a veterinary PBGM (89), and a benchtop analyzer (32) and compared with results obtained with plasma in a laboratory analyzer (hexokinase method). RESULTS: The human PBGM underestimated blood glucose concentration, had decreased accuracy at high Hcts, and had the lowest total error observed (11.4%). The veterinary PBGM overestimated blood glucose concentration, had decreased accuracy at low Hcts and at high blood glucose concentrations, and had the highest total error (15.5% and 29.8% for canine and feline settings, respectively). The benchtop analyzer had good accuracy and was not influenced by Hct or glucose concentrations. Clinical errors would have occurred in 0% of cases with the human PBGM and with the benchtop analyzer and in 9% (canine setting) to 6.7% (feline setting) of cases with the veterinary PBGM. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggested that use of the human PBGM evaluated in this study would be acceptable for point-of-care testing of blood glucose concentration in rabbits when benchtop analyzers are not available. The use of the veterinary PBGM evaluated in this study may alter both treatment and diagnostic decisions because of the overestimation of glucose concentrations in some rabbits.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24941392/