PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Pain relief with erector spinae block in dogs after spine surgery

By Pérez, Bartolome Rico et al.·Published in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne·2024·The Royal Veterinary College, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Perioperative analgesic effects of the erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine or bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 30 healthy adult dogs undergoing back surgery (hemilaminectomy) received a special pain relief technique called an erector spinae plane block with either bupivacaine alone or bupivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine. The dogs that received the combination treatment needed no additional pain medication during surgery and required less pain relief afterward compared to those who did not receive the block. This method significantly reduced the need for opioids like fentanyl and methadone, providing effective pain control during and after the procedure.

People also search for: dog back surgery pain relief · hemilaminectomy recovery in dogs · bupivacaine for dog surgery pain

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative opioid requirements among dogs receiving an erector spinae plane (ESP) block with bupivacaine, with or without dexmedetomidine, and a control group. ANIMALS AND PROCEDURE: Thirty client-owned, healthy adult dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy were included in this randomized, prospective, blinded clinical study. Dogs were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: Group B, ESP block with bupivacaine; Group BD, ESP block with bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine; and Group C, control. Rescue intra- and postoperative analgesia consisted of fentanyl and methadone, respectively. Postoperative pain was evaluated using the short form of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (CMPS-SF). RESULTS: In Group BD, 0/10 dogs required intraoperative fentanyl, compared to 9/10 in Group C (< 0.001), whereas 1/10 required postoperative methadone, compared to 9/10 in Group B (= 0.003) and 10/10 in Group C (< 0.001). The total amount of intraoperative fentanyl (&#x3bc;g/kg) was 0 (0 to 4) in Group B and 0 (0 to 0) in BD, compared to 6 (0 to 8) in C (= 0.004 and< 0.001, respectively). Postoperative methadone (mg/kg) required during the first 12 h was 0.5 (0 to 1.4) in Group B (= 0.003) and 0 (0 to 0) in BD (< 0.001), compared to C (= 0.003 and< 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: An ESP block with bupivacaine, with or without dexmedetomidine, was associated with a reduction in perioperative opioid consumption and provided effective acute pain control.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38694736/